Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that private companies, rather than governments, should pay for cleaning up the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people think that private companies, rather than governments, should pay for cleaning up the environment. with this opinion? GMjVg
The ever-intensifying environmental pollution has been hanging over human beings and threatening survival of creatures on our planet for many years. Although I agree that governments have drained substantial capitals to confront this issue, I do not think enterprises can be excluded from curbing contamination and deterioration. Obsessed with commercial production in greedy pursuit of profits, many industries are blind to how much pollutants they have discharged into the environment. During the process of industrialization, toxic gases contaminate the atmosphere, untreated sewage is poured into rivers and lakes, and soil erodes chronically undermined by waste material. As a result, the public fall victim to industrial development, suffering from various environment-related health problems such as respiratory diseases and food poisoning. Therefore, not only are companies obliged to actively reduce the pollutants released, but they should dedicate to environmental protection by facilitating research and development of clean energy and environmentally-friendly products to substitute for previous ones. Government always involves in preserving the environment from enacting laws to allocating financial reserves for protection projects. This is because regulations are justified to ensure private companies meet their environmental responsibilities. Likewise, taxes imposed on them enable authorities to relieve the pressure on environment by funding relevant researches. These prioritized policies are high on the government’s agenda in the drive to resolve problems. As government accumulates capitals from private companies and society, it is reasonable to tangibly invest in protection and implement other effective measures. In conclusion, private companies should embrace innovations in green technologies and business models so as to restrict the quantity of pollutants, whereas governments are also responsible for seizing the initiative to combat pollution by comprehensive methods.
The ever-intensifying environmental pollution has been hanging over human beings and threatening survival of creatures on our planet for
many
years. Although I
agree
that
governments
have drained substantial capitals to confront this issue, I do not
think
enterprises can
be excluded
from curbing contamination and deterioration.

Obsessed with commercial production in greedy pursuit of profits,
many
industries are blind to how
much
pollutants they have discharged into the environment. During the process of industrialization, toxic gases contaminate the atmosphere, untreated sewage
is poured
into rivers and lakes, and soil erodes
chronically
undermined by waste material.
As a result
, the public fall victim to industrial development, suffering from various environment-related health problems such as respiratory diseases and food poisoning.
Therefore
, not
only
are
companies
obliged to
actively
reduce
the pollutants released,
but
they should dedicate to environmental protection by facilitating research and development of clean energy and
environmentally
-friendly products to substitute for previous ones.

Government
always involves in preserving the environment from enacting laws to allocating financial reserves for protection projects. This is
because
regulations
are justified
to ensure private
companies
meet
their environmental responsibilities.
Likewise
, taxes imposed on them enable authorities to relieve the pressure on environment by funding relevant researches. These prioritized policies are high on the
government’s
agenda in the drive to resolve problems. As
government
accumulates capitals from private
companies
and society, it is reasonable to
tangibly
invest in protection and implement other effective measures.

In conclusion
, private
companies
should embrace innovations in green technologies and business models
so as to
restrict the quantity of pollutants, whereas
governments
are
also
responsible for seizing the initiative to combat pollution by comprehensive methods.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that private companies, rather than governments, should pay for cleaning up the environment. with this opinion?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
275 words
7.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 7.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 7.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: