Fresh water is one of the best valuable resources on earth, today an increasing number of water have been used both in personal and industry. So there are conflicting views on whether people can use water as they want or use water controlled by government. Advocates of free water using argue that fresh water can revive by water cycle in major areas, which means all water used will access to the rivers and lakes by raining. Another reason why use of water shouldn’t be banned is civilians always pay for water, so people will only open the water tap if it’s necessary.
However, it’s undeniable that not everyone can get the fresh and safe water, In Africa, children can’t take shower daily like in asia, in some countries nearby desert they haven’t enough water even to drink. So a part of opponents argue that the rich would live in a house with a big garden consuming great water and the poor would be dead for lack of water without government controlling in these countries.
In my opinion, whether government should control civilian’s water-using rely on the richness of water resources, To be more specific, for countries lack of water policies should be adopted to make sure that water only be used in necessary. Nevertheless, quality of life of civilians will be improve obviously in a country be rich in water if people be allowed to use as much fresh water as they want.
Fresh
water
is one of the best valuable resources on earth,
today
an increasing number of
water
have been
used
both in personal and industry.
So
there are conflicting views on whether
people
can
use
water
as they want or
use
water
controlled by
government
. Advocates of free
water
using argue that
fresh
water
can revive by
water
cycle in major areas, which means all
water
used
will access to the rivers and lakes by raining. Another reason why
use
of
water
shouldn’t
be banned
is civilians always pay for
water
,
so
people
will
only
open the
water
tap if it’s necessary.
However
, it’s undeniable that not everyone can
get
the
fresh
and safe
water
, In Africa, children can’t take shower daily like in
asia
, in
some
countries nearby desert they haven’t
enough
water
even to drink.
So
a part of opponents argue that the rich would
live
in a
house
with a
big
garden consuming great
water
and the poor would be dead for lack of
water
without
government
controlling in these countries.
In my opinion, whether
government
should control civilian’s water-using rely on the richness of
water
resources, To be more specific, for countries lack of
water
policies should
be adopted
to
make
sure that
water
only
be
used
in necessary.
Nevertheless
, quality of life of civilians will be
improve
obviously
in a country be rich in
water
if
people
be
allowed
to
use
as much
fresh
water
as they want.