Children's nurture and the boundaries of parents' responsibilities is one of the controversial debates in recent years. Some experts claim that parents are responsible for teaching social behaviour to children. Numerous others suggest that tutors should teach pupils the ways to be a good member of society. I will elaborate on both of these viewpoints in this essay, even though I share the first view.
On the one hand, large groups of people insist on parents' role in forming children's character. Parents are the first persons with whom infants interact; thus, they have a vital role in a child's personality. So, the parentship us more than providing the physical requirement and they should teach social and moral values to their child. Because when the students go to school, their character foundation is formed, and tutors only can be the reason for personality evolution.
On the other hand, several people opine that school is the place to teach children how to be a good society member. They believe that each family has its particular culture, and everyone teaches different criteria about being a good person to the children. Consequently, one of the teacher's duties, especially in elementary school, is to give a unique definition of a good citizen and train pupils proper behaviour.
Having manifested the aforementioned points of view, several think that the parent has to teach social behaviour values to their children because family is the first society that children contact. On the contrary, others assert that each family teach their children various criteria, so schools should be the place to give children specific definition for moral values. I believe that the second viewpoint ignores that, beyond the family cultures disparity, the factors of a responsible and productive member of society have a clear description and the diversity of the ways that parents treat their children cannot affect these factors.
Children's nurture and the boundaries of parents' responsibilities is one of the controversial debates in recent years.
Some
experts claim that
parents
are responsible for teaching social
behaviour
to
children
. Numerous others suggest that tutors should
teach
pupils the ways to be a
good
member of
society
. I will elaborate on both of these viewpoints in this essay,
even though
I share the
first
view.
On the one hand, large groups of
people
insist on parents' role in forming children's character.
Parents
are the
first
persons with whom infants interact;
thus
, they have a vital role in a child's personality.
So
, the
parentship
us more than providing the physical
requirement and
they should
teach
social and moral values to their child.
Because
when the students go to
school
, their character foundation
is formed
, and tutors
only
can be the reason for personality evolution.
On the other hand
, several
people
opine that
school
is the place to
teach
children
how to be a
good
society
member. They believe that each
family
has its particular culture, and everyone
teaches
different
criteria about being a
good
person to the
children
.
Consequently
, one of the teacher's duties,
especially
in elementary
school
, is to give a unique definition of a
good
citizen and train pupils proper
behaviour
.
Having manifested the aforementioned points of view, several
think
that the
parent
has to
teach
social
behaviour
values to their
children
because
family
is the
first
society
that
children
contact.
On the contrary
, others assert that each
family
teach
their
children
various criteria,
so
schools
should be the place to give
children
specific definition for moral values. I believe that the second viewpoint
ignores
that, beyond the
family
cultures disparity, the factors of a responsible and productive member of
society
have a
clear
description and the diversity of the ways that
parents
treat their
children
cannot affect these factors.