Some people think that only those people who have been working in a company for a longer time should get a promotion. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Although, basic studies are more Brignificant for acquis much worthful in its place. Attaining has always been a debatable issue andong People and claim that it's only based on the stime period will arque an employee gave to its firm. This essay the length that the idea of having promotion and workt despite time is entirely unnecessary Some potential benefits. People work not only for money but to get a chean position in then filld. In fact, the love they spend in their company polish their work and make them more experienced, and liable to hold promotion. Precedently, they gel med to understand a responsion liteer regarding then work, which master them to become fast and punctual. Mother quality for working extended teuer is to be habitual for team work trafd adjust with others, which beast an organizations profil. These personnel became well planned and familiar willl the goods and bads of their company. These few instances have bolstered the idea that recommendation based completely -The firm. on the tenure an employee served to Despite some numer boons associated with the promition based on line spars, the effective that it is mendating and logical, in completely preposterous. Some new at suitable candictates amers gave more date Itatistics of last two decades for enjoying fintherance. shows the bulk of highly qualified workers in either government or forirate sectors, who has been py gf to little experienced workers in more high skilled and their tasks more than ay senios worker. soudate legal with their endorsement with longer the is ill-formed and and could potentially lead to a far outrageout come worse This essay argued that people who favour the longer duration I for promotion have a flawsed und standin of it and the affects of 101 they Believe. In my opinion, Skill and quality wosk is one