Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

some people think that it is necessary to use animal for test medicine or other product intended for human use others however criticize this as animal cruelty discuss both of these views and give your opinion

some people think that it is necessary to use animal for test medicine or other product intended for human use others however criticize this as animal cruelty discuss both of these views and give your opinion Mmjop
Animal testing is happening from many years continuously. Few masses asserted that utilisation of fauna to evaluate result of a medicament or another chemical drugs in order to use for patient care however, rest of them believe that censuring this as a pet groomer. Prior to drawn a form opinion both aspect of this notion will be examined in forthcoming paragraphs. To commence with, animal testing for medication is fruitful in order to get best result prior to test on human being. In other words, usage of animal for producing pill to cure disease of human sapiens. Just because of that researcher cannot experiment directly on masses. Due to hazardous effect of chemical used in medicine seldomly. Therefore, in order to make effective product to cure illness in human, It is not wrong to tested on fauna species. Next to it, animal have almost similar functioning in body and result of any chemical product observe an animal that it is effective or not. Furthermore, the compounds are used in medicine are being remedy for human being testing is compulsory prior to implement it. For example, mice is best species to get the similar result as It happened with mankind. Nonetheless, It is not a best approach to examine any medicines. There are various reason behind this. Firstly, animal also have feeling like a humans. When experiments are done on a species of better than they also feel pain and sometimes they lost their life owning to experimentation. Moreover, animal also have right to live as human being. Due to testing count of fauna would be fall down as a result some species on the extinction. Secondly, Authorities should established any other equipment for research. To explain it, nowadays due to advancement in technology lot of equipment are invented. With the aid of computer result of any remedies can be identified. Government should declare it quash. To recapitulate it, In my perspective, Although testing on animals could save humans life from bad effect of pills because fauna have same functioning system of body yet species of animal also be valuable neither they will be factored aur disappeared as well as other tools can be used as compared to live animal.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is happening from
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
years
continuously
. Few masses asserted that
Possible spelling mistake. 'utilisation' is British English.
utilisation
of fauna to evaluate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
of a medicament or another chemical drugs in order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
for patient care
however
, rest of them believe that censuring this as a pet groomer. Prior
Did you mean "to draw"?
to drawn
a form opinion both aspect of this notion will
be examined
in forthcoming paragraphs.

To commence with,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
for medication is fruitful in order to
A determiner is probably missing here: "get the best".
get best
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
prior to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
test
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being.
In other words
, usage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
for producing pill to cure disease of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
sapiens.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Just
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of that researcher cannot experiment
directly
on masses. Due to hazardous effect of chemical
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in medicine
Possible spelling mistake found.
seldomly
.
Therefore
, in order to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
effective product to cure illness in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
, It is not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
tested
on fauna species.
Next
to it,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
have almost similar functioning in body and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
of any chemical product observe an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
that it is effective or not.
Furthermore
, the compounds are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in medicine are being remedy for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
is compulsory prior to implement it.
For example
, mice
A determiner is probably missing here: "is the best".
is best
species to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
the similar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
as It happened with mankind.

Nonetheless, It is not
Use "the" with the superlative.
a
best approach to examine any medicines. There are various reason behind this.
Firstly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
also
have feeling like a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
. When experiments
are done
on a species of better than they
also
feel pain and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
sometimes
they lost their
Did you mean "lives"?
life
owning to experimentation.
Moreover
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
also
have right to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
human
being. Due to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
count of fauna would be fall down as a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
species on the extinction.
Secondly
, Authorities should
The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: "establish"
established
any other equipment for research. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explain
it, nowadays due to advancement in technology lot of equipment
are invented
. With the aid of computer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
result
of any remedies can
be identified
.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Government
should declare it quash.

To recapitulate it, In my perspective, Although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
testing
on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animals
could save
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
humans
life from
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bad
effect of pills
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
fauna have same functioning system of body
yet
species of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
also
be valuable neither they will
be factored
Possible spelling mistake found.
aur
disappeared
as well
as other tools can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
as compared to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
live
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
animal
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay some people think that it is necessary to use animal for test medicine or other product intended for human use others however criticize this as animal cruelty discuss both of these views and give your opinion

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
369 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts