Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.

It is a common idea that visiting some countries is the only way to get knowledge about the other places and cultures. While nowadays, given that the Internet and TV resources rapidly evolved, most people share an idea that all knowledge obtained while travelling can be obtained from online and broadcast programs as well. Although, both ideas have its solid and weak arguments. On the one hand, nothing compares to the travelling. Obviously, when you discover some new place while you are really there, you can see, hear, smell and taste it. Therefore, you gain totally new feelings and impressions which you would never get from the web pages or TV screens. For example, take Paris, you can know everything about the Paris and Eiffel Tower, but you hardly can see the overpopulated by tourist city centre, or the long queues to enter the Eiffel Tower, followed with big noise and high prices. Definitely, walking around some place has its own advantages over just listening or watching about it. On the other hand, today we have a variety of TV-shows, blogs, web services and channels about travelling, which provides us with sufficient information about all the aspects of life, culture, language and detailed description about the any interested area. For instance, there are thousands of YouTube videos about anything in the world. Consequently, you can learn from such videos almost everything, including language dialects, food, clothes, prices, tickets and even find a friend from there to talk. In my opinion, both viewpoints have its followers according to their conditions. Undoubtedly, if you can travel it is the best choice. However, while sitting at home or at work anyone still able to learn a lot about other countries worldwide. In conclusion, we can see that it is hard to say that travelling is better to learn about the foreign places, or watching the National Geographic channel and browsing websites is alternative to travel. Accordingly, we can state that two points of view actually supplement each other, and can be used as support to each other.
It is a common
idea
that visiting
some
countries is the
only
way to
get
knowledge about the
other
places
and cultures. While nowadays,
given
that the Internet and TV resources
rapidly
evolved, most
people
share an
idea
that all knowledge obtained while
travelling
can
be obtained
from online and broadcast programs
as well
. Although, both
ideas
have its solid and weak arguments.

On the one hand, nothing compares to the
travelling
.
Obviously
, when you discover
some
new
place
while you are
really
there, you can
see
, hear, smell and taste it.
Therefore
, you gain
totally
new feelings and impressions which you would never
get
from the web pages or TV screens.
For example
, take Paris, you can know everything about the Paris and Eiffel Tower,
but
you hardly can
see
the overpopulated by tourist city
centre
, or the long queues to enter the Eiffel Tower, followed with
big
noise and high prices. Definitely, walking around
some
place
has its
own
advantages over
just
listening or watching about it.

On the
other
hand,
today
we have a variety of TV-
shows
, blogs, web services and channels about
travelling
, which provides us with sufficient information about all the aspects of life, culture, language and detailed description about the any interested area.
For instance
, there are thousands of YouTube videos about anything in the world.
Consequently
, you can learn from such videos almost everything, including language dialects, food, clothes, prices, tickets and even find a friend from there to talk.

In my opinion, both viewpoints have its followers according to their conditions.
Undoubtedly
, if you can travel it is the best choice.
However
, while sitting at home or at work anyone
still
able to learn a lot about
other
countries worldwide.

In conclusion
, we can
see
that it is
hard
to say that
travelling
is better to learn about the foreign
places
, or watching the
National Geographic channel
and browsing websites is alternative to travel.
Accordingly
, we can state that two points of view actually supplement each
other
, and can be
used
as support to each
other
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries, but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
344 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts