Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that it is better to choose a job early and keep doing it than frequently changing jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think that it is better to choose a job early and keep doing it than frequently changing jobs. APRn3
It is stated that staying in the same job for a long time is more beneficial than switching jobs regularly. While I agree job hopping is advantageous to some extent, I hold that a stable job offers surpassing benefits to both employees and their company. On the one hand, job hoppers receive possible merits. They can step outside their comfort zone to have more chances to experience different working environments. Clearly, those people are likely to figure out their strengths and weaknesses; therefore, they can identify the most suitable profession that fits their competence and interest. However, employees' regular alternation in occupation can be harmful from the company’s perspective. The reason is that a body of people who do not remain in a position in the long run may lead to the wasteful resources in training. As a result, the company's budget is ineffectively used and even other investments are detrimentally affected. On the other hand, sticking to the same occupation for a long period is beneficial. In terms of people having a stable job, they often gain career advancement. When they have long-term association with their company, they tend to become loyal and senior employees. Hence, they have more opportunities to be considered for promotion annually and move up the career ladder without certain difficulties. Regarding their company, keeping the same job for a long time also has positive impacts. Since the senior employees have a complete understanding of the operations and functional nature of the job, it can boost labor productivity of the companies. For example, in some factories in Vietnam, the majority of entrepreneurs generate substantial profits thanks to a large number of the senior workers in at least five years. In conclusion, although job hopping is somewhat desirable because of the sense of agency, I still firmly believe that staying in the same job for a long time is more favorable to individuals and their company.
It
is stated
that staying in the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
long
time is more beneficial than switching
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
regularly
. While I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
hopping is advantageous to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent, I hold that a stable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
offers surpassing benefits to both employees and their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
.

On the one hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
hoppers receive possible merits. They can step outside their comfort zone to have more chances to experience
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
working environments.
Clearly
, those
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
are likely to figure out their strengths and weaknesses;
therefore
, they can identify the most suitable profession that fits their competence and interest.
However
, employees' regular alternation in occupation can be harmful from the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company’s
perspective. The reason is that a body of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
who do not remain in a position in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
long
run may lead to the wasteful resources in training.
As a result
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
's budget is
ineffectively
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
and even other investments are
detrimentally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
affected
.

On the other hand
, sticking to the same occupation for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
long
period is beneficial. In terms of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
having a stable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
, they
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
gain career advancement. When they have long-term association with their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
, they tend to become loyal and senior employees.
Hence
, they have more opportunities to
be considered
for promotion
annually
and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
up the career ladder without certain difficulties. Regarding their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
, keeping the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
long
time
also
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
impacts. Since the senior employees have a complete understanding of the operations and functional nature of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
, it can boost labor productivity of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
.
For example
, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
factories in Vietnam, the majority of entrepreneurs generate substantial profits thanks to
Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use "many" or "numerous"
a large number of
the senior workers in at least five years.

In conclusion
, although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
hopping is somewhat desirable
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of the sense of agency, I
still
firmly
believe that staying in the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
long
time is more favorable to individuals and their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that it is better to choose a job early and keep doing it than frequently changing jobs.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
320 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people think that it is better to choose a job early and keep doing it than frequently changing jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?