Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature, such as novels and poems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that it is a waste of time for high school students to study literature, such as novels and poems. DlNrj
Many today claim that learning literature in high school is a waste of time. In my opinion, even though there is some practicality in the argument but literature still serves a purpose.
On one hand, the proponents of this argument state that other subjects should be prioritized. In other words, schools should give more attention and focus on other subjects like science, mathematics or commerce. Since the student’s career choice completely depends on this. Majority of the students will pursue higher studies in order to become doctors, engineers or business people and thus, they will forget the literature which they learned at high school. Therefore, the effort of teaching literature to high school students is futile.
On the other hand, nonetheless, literature is also equally mandatory. In other words, not only career choices and their related subjects but literature too is irreplaceable. Since, most of the literary works contain beneficial, as well as fundamental life lessons which help’s people to lead a quality life. For example authors like, Leo Tolstoy mainly focuses on philosophical and psychological issues which are applicable to each and every individual’s life. Moreover, literature helps us to learn the language in-depth making the communication, using it easier.
In conclusion, admittedly other career-oriented subjects are important but literature still holds a high position in the academics. As not only it teaches other fundamental life lessons in a creative manner but also assists to master the language. Thus, high school students must be encouraged to learn literature and schools should make it interesting too.
Many
today
claim that learning
literature
in
high
school
is a waste of time. In my opinion,
even though
there is
some
practicality in the argument
but
literature
still
serves a purpose.
On one hand, the proponents of this argument state that
other
subjects
should
be prioritized
. In
other
words,
schools
should give more attention and focus on
other
subjects
like science, mathematics or commerce.
Since
the
student’s
career choice completely depends on this. Majority of the
students
will pursue higher studies in order to become doctors, engineers or business
people
and
thus
, they will forget the
literature
which they learned at
high
school
.
Therefore
, the effort of teaching
literature
to
high
school
students
is futile.
On the
other
hand, nonetheless,
literature
is
also
equally
mandatory. In
other
words, not
only
career choices and their related
subjects
but
literature
too is irreplaceable. Since, most of the literary works contain beneficial,
as well
as fundamental
life
lessons which
help
’s
people
to lead a quality
life
.
For example
authors like, Leo Tolstoy
mainly
focuses on philosophical and psychological issues which are applicable to each and every individual’s
life
.
Moreover
,
literature
helps
us to learn the language in-depth making the communication, using it easier.
In conclusion
,
admittedly
other
career-oriented
subjects
are
important
but
literature
still
holds a
high
position in the academics. As not
only
it teaches
other
fundamental
life
lessons
in a creative manner
but
also
assists to master the language.
Thus
,
high
school
students
must
be encouraged
to learn
literature
and
schools
should
make
it interesting too.