In recent years there has been an increase in the number of international sports events across the globe.
While some people believe that an opportunity to host such a major event would be good for the country, others disagree and believe that it would prove to be bad. In this essay I will discuss both point of views and lend my partial support to the former.
Task of hosting an international event comes with responsibility and requires months of preparation. If the event is a grand success, not only the efforts of the country would be appreciated but also the capability would be highlighted. For instance, in 2016 Olympics event hosted by China, they managed to artificially stop the rain which resulted in a dry opening day. Furthermore, the opening ceremony was unique and memorable. The media coverage assured that the commendable efforts of the country reached every corner of the world. Hence there was an excellent visibility and the opportunity provided a platform for the country to showcase its research and development capabilities as well.
On the other hand, it may prove to be otherwise if there are negatives highlighted during this period. For example the terrorist attack on one of the Sri Lankan players during a major ICC international cricket event hosted by Pakistan led to fear and panic amongst all the cricket playing nations. This eventually led in a temporary ban on Pakistan for hosting any kind of international cricket event until an alternative is suggested and accepted. Going forward all the countries would have security concerns while travelling to Pakistan.
In conclusion, though it may prove to be a double edged sword which can always be a case with an opportunity, I believe that this golden opportunity is much larger and if handled well the positives and the good for the future of the country outnumber the negatives.
In recent years there has been an increase in the number of
international
sports
events
across the globe.
While
some
people
believe that an
opportunity
to host such a major
event
would be
good
for the
country
, others disagree and believe that it would prove to be
bad
. In this essay I will discuss both point of views and lend my partial support to the former.
Task of hosting an
international
event
comes
with responsibility and requires months of preparation. If the
event
is a grand success, not
only
the efforts of the
country
would
be appreciated
but
also
the capability would
be highlighted
.
For instance
, in 2016 Olympics
event
hosted by China, they managed to
artificially
stop
the rain which resulted in a dry opening day.
Furthermore
, the opening ceremony was unique and memorable. The media coverage assured that the commendable efforts of the
country
reached every corner of the world.
Hence
there was an excellent visibility and the
opportunity
provided a platform for the
country
to showcase its research and development capabilities
as well
.
On the other hand
, it may prove to be
otherwise
if there are negatives highlighted during this period.
For example
the terrorist attack on one of the Sri Lankan players during a major ICC
international
cricket
event
hosted by Pakistan led to fear and panic amongst all the cricket playing nations. This
eventually
led in a temporary ban on Pakistan for hosting any kind of
international
cricket
event
until an alternative
is suggested
and
accepted
. Going forward all the
countries
would have security concerns while travelling to Pakistan.
In conclusion
, though it may prove to be a
double edged
sword which can always be a case with an
opportunity
, I believe that this golden
opportunity
is much larger and if handled well the positives and the
good
for the future of the
country
outnumber the negatives.