As the world is a global village now, many different kinds of events are held internationally. A lot of countries do not just want to be the participants, they also want to be the organizer of these events. However, some people think hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while others hold a different opinion.
Some people think it is an honour to host an interesting sports event in their country. Moreover, they consider this as a great opportunity to welcome people from around the world and to show how friendly and passionate their people are. In addition, it is a great way to show how strong and powerful the country is by the way the country hosts the event. Furthermore, the event can help attract more visitors and boost the economy.
On the other hand, some people think it is bad for the country to host an international sports event. One major argument is that the country has to spend a huge amount of money on building some infrastures for the sports event. Some infrastures may become useless after the event. Take the Olympic Games as an example, Beijing hosted this event in 2008. A stadium which shaped like a bird nest and a venue that is called the "water cube" were built for this event at that time. Now, they all become a tourist attraction. Some concerts are held in those venues as well. Some people consider building these venues specifically for this event is money-consuming as they become literally useless after the event.
To sum up, I think there are both pros and cons about hosting an international sports event in the country. After considering views from both sides, I believe the pros outweigh the cons. As far as I know, every country has to make plans and submit proposals to compete for the opportunity to host this event. The government should have carefully examined all aspects before they submit their proposals. Based on previous experiences, I think the advantages of hosting an international sports event are more than the disadvantages.
As the world is a global village
now
,
many
different
kinds of
events
are held
internationally
.
A lot of
countries
do not
just
want to be the participants, they
also
want to be the organizer of these
events
.
However
,
some
people
think
hosting an
international
sports
event
is
good
for the
country
, while others hold a
different
opinion.
Some
people
think
it is an
honour
to
host
an interesting
sports
event
in their
country
.
Moreover
, they consider this as a great opportunity to welcome
people
from around the world and to
show
how friendly and passionate their
people
are.
In addition
, it is a great way to
show
how strong and powerful the
country
is by
the way the
country
hosts
the
event
.
Furthermore
, the
event
can
help
attract more visitors and boost the economy.
On the other hand
,
some
people
think
it is
bad
for the
country
to
host
an
international
sports
event
. One major argument is that the
country
has to
spend a huge amount of money on building
some
infrastures
for the
sports
event
.
Some
infrastures
may become useless after the
event
. Take the Olympic Games as an example, Beijing hosted this
event
in 2008. A stadium which shaped like a bird nest and a venue that
is called
the
"
water cube
"
were built
for this
event
at that time.
Now
, they all become a tourist attraction.
Some
concerts
are held
in those venues
as well
.
Some
people
consider building these venues
specifically
for this
event
is money-consuming as they become
literally
useless after the
event
.
To sum up, I
think
there are both pros and cons about hosting an
international
sports
event
in the
country
. After considering views from both sides, I believe the pros outweigh the cons. As far as I know, every
country
has to
make
plans and submit proposals to compete for the opportunity to
host
this
event
. The
government
should have
carefully
examined all aspects
before
they submit their proposals. Based on previous experiences, I
think
the advantages of hosting an
international
sports
event
are more than the disadvantages.