Nelson Mandela once said, “Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world. ” While many agree that education is indeed essential, a handful believes that state funds should only be allocated to those who are studying subjects that are relevant to society. In this essay, I will share why should there be no discrimination between students who study necessary subjects and those who are not.
First of all, there are indeed some subjects that take precedence over others. Science, some says, is more relevant than the arts since it enables us to develop new technologies, solve practical problems, and make informed decisions. That may be true but that does not mean that those who are taking humanities subjects are irrelevant. I, for one, am a Theological student. It is more than studying history or reading types of literatures, it fosters critical-thinking skills and aids in problem-solving. Hence, there is no such thing as one subject is more useful than the other as each major is unique in its own right.
Secondly, education is a powerful agent of change. Everyone, including those in academia, business, and government, plays an important role be it Humanities or Sciences. Government support of a higher education can help to eliminate the need for welfare. Furthermore, it helps to reduce the levels of family or class-related poverty. Nowadays, prices have increased substantially. The capacity to make life choices is indeed important. The more governments pay equally for both sides, the adaptation to the world around them is easier.
To sum it up, despite the argument of only professionals in some fields are needed, I believe that obtaining an education is everyone’s right. As a result, there should be equality in terms of governments bearing the cost of education. This would ensure the growth of both individuals and nation. Each and every branch of education should thus be entitled to government fellowships.
Nelson Mandela once said,
“Education
is the most powerful weapon which you can
use
to
change
the world. ” While
many
agree
that
education
is
indeed
essential, a handful believes that state funds should
only
be allocated
to those
who
are studying
subjects
that are relevant to society. In this essay, I will share why should there be no discrimination between students
who
study necessary
subjects
and those
who
are not.
First of all
, there are
indeed
some
subjects
that take precedence over others. Science,
some
says, is more relevant than the arts since it enables us to develop new technologies, solve practical problems, and
make
informed decisions. That may be true
but
that does not mean that those
who
are taking humanities
subjects
are irrelevant. I, for one, am a Theological student. It is more than studying history or reading types of literatures, it fosters critical-thinking
skills
and aids in problem-solving.
Hence
, there is no such thing as one
subject
is more useful than the other as each major is unique in its
own
right.
Secondly
,
education
is a powerful agent of
change
. Everyone, including those in academia, business, and
government
, plays an
important
role be it Humanities or Sciences.
Government
support of a higher
education
can
help
to eliminate the need for welfare.
Furthermore
, it
helps
to
reduce
the levels of family or
class
-related poverty. Nowadays, prices have increased
substantially
. The capacity to
make
life choices is
indeed
important
. The more
governments
pay
equally
for both sides, the adaptation to the world around them is easier.
To sum it up, despite the argument of
only
professionals in
some
fields
are needed
, I believe that obtaining an
education
is everyone’s right.
As a result
, there should be equality in terms of
governments
bearing the cost of
education
. This would ensure the growth of both individuals and nation. Each and every branch of
education
should
thus
be entitled
to
government
fellowships.