Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important. awJmY
From the perspective of some people, aid agencies can take advantage of celebrities’ fame to raise public awareness of certain important matters. Others, however, hold the view that such a method may only bring counterproductive results. I find the latter argument more convincing. Those who support the idea of using famed individuals’ assistance have their own justifications. First of all, people who are considered role models have considerable influence on the public. Emma Watson, for instance, being a prominent actress, is currently the goodwill ambassador for the United Nations, promoting gender equality and undoubtedly drawing a great deal of attention from her admirers. Furthermore, a wider range of population can be reached if an organisation’s campaign is represented by a popular star. In many parts of the world, some film stars are even more well-known to the locals than the organisation itself owing to their appearance in familiar cinematic products. Therefore the introduction of a humanitarian campaign can be further facilitated thanks to the artists. Nevertheless, I can understand why other people are against inviting celebrities for assistance. When relying on the fame of some people to attract more public attention, an aid programme can also be affected by their scandals. Mass public disapproval may arise from a representative receiving a speeding ticket, or getting caught using illegal drugs, undervaluing the significance of the aid programme. Another foreseeable drawback is that the public might take the presence of famous entertainers as a mere publicity stunt. Without the evidence of real actions taken to mitigate a problem, such as participating in a voluntary team to help the people in need, famous people may fail to draw the attention of people to the situation. In conclusion, while some people have reasons to believe in the success of celebrities in getting people to pay attention, I tend to think that such an approach might not prove to be effective for aid organisations as expected.
From the perspective of
some
people
,
aid
agencies can take advantage of celebrities’ fame to raise
public
awareness of certain
important
matters. Others,
however
, hold the view that such a method may
only
bring counterproductive results. I find the latter argument more convincing. Those who support the
idea
of using famed individuals’ assistance have their
own
justifications.
First of all
,
people
who
are considered
role models have considerable influence on the
public
. Emma Watson,
for instance
, being a prominent actress, is
currently
the goodwill ambassador for the United Nations, promoting gender equality and
undoubtedly
drawing a great deal of
attention
from her admirers.
Furthermore
, a wider range of population can
be reached
if an
organisation
’s campaign
is represented
by a popular star. In
many
parts of the world,
some
film stars are even more well-known to the locals than the
organisation
itself owing to their appearance in familiar cinematic products.
Therefore
the introduction of a humanitarian campaign can be
further
facilitated thanks to the artists.

Nevertheless
, I can understand why other
people
are against inviting celebrities for assistance. When relying on the fame of
some
people
to attract more
public
attention
, an
aid
programme
can
also
be
affected
by their scandals. Mass
public
disapproval may arise from a representative receiving a speeding ticket, or getting caught using illegal drugs, undervaluing the significance of the
aid
programme
. Another foreseeable drawback is that the
public
might take the presence of
famous
entertainers as a mere publicity stunt. Without the evidence of real actions taken to mitigate a problem, such as participating in a voluntary team to
help
the
people
in need,
famous
people
may fail to draw the
attention
of
people
to the situation.

In conclusion
, while
some
people
have reasons to believe in the success of celebrities in getting
people
to pay
attention
, I tend to
think
that such an approach might not prove to be effective for
aid
organisations
as
expected
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important.

Essay
  American English
3 paragraphs
321 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts