It is irrefutable that education plays a vital role in building the carrier of people. Therefore, some group of civilians holds the opinion that every person has right for education, so national authority should implement free tuition for everyone who pursues higher education. I largely disagree with the aforesaid notion and my disagreement on the basis of explanations provided further.
On the one hand, there are myriad understable reasons why the tuition fee should not be free. Firstly, unqualified students takes the advantage of free education while deserving students choose an alternative path. To illustrates this, if the government does free education for all people, then overqualified students will suffer to enroll in a top university. Even though, free education is good for society, once people pay for school, by this way they show their awareness regarding education.
Secondly, free further education can increase the rate of unemployment. To clarify this claim, due to a great number of so-called well-educated people which makes the labor market more competitive. For instance, in Vietnam, there is a dramatic decline in job opportunities because every year significant fresh graduates pass out from university who are seeking the job.
On the other hand, the university is already adopted free education to some extent. Out of all the grounds, the most profound one is that scholarship gets the motivation to brilliant students. Unless and until, government offer students full or half- fee scholarship, they do not feel motivated and help them to maintain capital sources.
By the way of conclusion, although free tuition deposit is beneficial for the masses, it also carries detrimental drawbacks such as less opportunity for qualified students and unemployment. 
It is irrefutable that  
education
 plays a vital role in building the carrier of  
people
.  
Therefore
,  
some
 group of civilians holds the opinion that every person has right for  
education
,  
so
 national authority should implement  
free
 tuition for everyone who pursues higher  
education
. I  
largely
 disagree with the aforesaid notion and my disagreement on the basis of explanations provided  
further
.
On the one hand, there are myriad understable reasons why the tuition fee should not be  
free
.  
Firstly
, unqualified  
students
 takes the advantage of  
free
  education
 while deserving  
students
 choose an alternative path. To illustrates this, if the  
government
 does  
free
  education
 for all  
people
, then overqualified  
students
 will suffer to enroll in a top university.  
Even though
,  
free
  education
 is  
good
 for society, once  
people
 pay for school, by this way they  
show
 their awareness regarding education. 
Secondly
,  
free
  further
  education
 can increase the rate of unemployment. To clarify this claim, due to a great number of  
so
-called well-educated  
people
 which  
makes
 the labor market more competitive.  
For instance
, in Vietnam, there is a dramatic decline in job opportunities  
because
 every year significant fresh graduates pass out from university who are seeking the job. 
On the other hand
, the university is already adopted  
free
  education
 to  
some
 extent. Out of all the grounds, the most profound one is that scholarship  
gets
 the motivation to brilliant  
students
. Unless and until,  
government
 offer  
students
 full or half- fee scholarship, they do not feel motivated and  
help
 them to maintain capital sources.
By the way of conclusion, although  
free
 tuition deposit is beneficial for the masses, it  
also
 carries detrimental drawbacks such as less opportunity for qualified  
students
 and unemployment.