Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that environment before a decade Is much more clear than today to what extent do you agree or disagree

Some people think that environment before a decade Is much more clear than today 70103
It is often said that environmental dangers are regularly too great for peculiar countries or individuals to solve and the only method to reduce the problems of the environment is at a global level. From my point of, view, I strongly agree with this idea that the problem of the environment should be lessened by international organizations. Firstly, one of the conspicuous reasons for this argument is preventing creat damage to the natural environment by universal organizations. For example, international groups usually force the governments to prohibit hazardous activities by factories such as spiling toxic wastes in rivers in addition to creating pollutants. This would create a regulation at a universal level besides a distinctive rull to perform by all countries in the world. Therefore this makes it clear why enforcing universal rules could help to lessen environmental problems. Secondly, another significant reason is the benefits of creating a global organization to help countries related to problems of the environment. For instance, establishing universal groups besides pressure groups in rainforests to inhibit illegal hunting and logging could reduce the number of dangers in the environment. This is a quality that the international level has but countries and individuals don't have. As a result, it becomes apparent global supervision could be always the best measure to reduce the problems of the environment. To summarise, I completely believe that legislating at global levels is the sole means to diminish environmental trouble. It is predicted that with international supervision the problem of the natural environment will continue to lessen constructively.
It is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
said that environmental
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
are
regularly
too great for peculiar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
or individuals to solve and the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
method to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
is at a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
. From my point of, view, I
strongly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
idea
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
should
be lessened
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
international
organizations.

Firstly
, one of the conspicuous reasons for this argument is preventing
Possible spelling mistake found.
creat
damage to the natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universal
organizations.
For example
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
international
groups
usually
force the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
to prohibit hazardous activities by factories such as
Possible spelling mistake found.
spiling
toxic wastes in rivers
in addition
to creating pollutants. This would create a regulation at a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
besides
a distinctive
Possible spelling mistake found.
rull
to perform by all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in the world.
Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Therefore
this
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
makes
it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
why enforcing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universal
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
to lessen environmental problems.

Secondly
, another significant reason is the benefits of creating a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
global
organization to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
related to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
For instance
, establishing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
universal
groups
besides
pressure groups in rainforests to inhibit illegal hunting and logging could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
dangers
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. This is a quality that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
international
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
and individuals don't have.
As a result
, it becomes apparent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
global
supervision could be always the best measure to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problems
of the environment.

To
Possible spelling mistake. 'summarise' is British English.
summarise
, I completely believe that legislating at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
global
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
is the sole means to diminish environmental trouble. It
is predicted
that with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
international
supervision the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
problem
of the natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
will continue to lessen
constructively
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that environment before a decade Is much more clear than today

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
257 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people think that environment before a decade Is much more clear than today to what extent do you agree or disagree