Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that city governments should spend more money to promote bicycle use in cities. Others, however, believe that cities should focus on investing in public transportation systems like trains or buses. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that city governments should spend more money to promote bicycle use in cities. Others, however, believe that cities should focus on investing in public transportation systems like trains or buses. 8a5ar
While some people think that the local administration should increase funding to encourage bicycle use among citizens, others opine that more emphasis ought to be given to strengthening the public transport networks. In my opinion, the authorities should take both measures to improve the traffic situation in cities. On the one hand, some people believe that the state should spend money to motivate bicycle use as it is healthy and environment friendly. When people are encouraged to use bicycles as the primary mode of transport pollution and consumption of fossil fuels will come down. To illustrate this, as the majority of people are using bicycles in Melbourne, the amount of particulate matter in air is very low according to a recent survey by the state. Furthermore, it is observed that when more people start using the bicycle the society becomes healthier. As cycling is a good physical activity, people who regularly use bicycle to commute stay healthy and this will motivate others to adopt this practice. On the other hand, others contend that improving public transport networks through enhanced funding by the state will save time and reduce traffic congestion in cities. An efficient and affordable transport system is considered a boon to office goers and ordinary people as it saves much time which is very vital in their busy work schedule. So it is the responsibility of the state to allocate more funds for building an efficient public transport system. A clear example of this is the metro train service in Chennai which has efficiently reduced the travel time by half for people travelling on it. Moreover, the provision of a good transport system in the cities helps to control the traffic congestion which is considered to be a mounting issue in most cities due to urbanisation and population outburst. To sum up, after analysing the situation, it is not hard to see that both approaches have their merits. In my opinion, the government should encourage cycling and at the same time it should invest more in public transport systems.
While
some
people
think
that the local administration should increase funding to encourage
bicycle
use
among citizens, others opine that more emphasis ought to be
given
to strengthening the
public
transport
networks. In my opinion, the authorities should take both measures to
improve
the traffic situation in cities.

On the one hand,
some
people
believe that the
state
should spend money to motivate
bicycle
use
as it is healthy and environment friendly. When
people
are encouraged
to
use
bicycles
as the primary mode of
transport
pollution and consumption of fossil fuels will
come
down. To illustrate this, as the majority of
people
are using
bicycles
in Melbourne, the amount of particulate matter in air is
very
low according to a recent survey by the
state
.
Furthermore
, it
is observed
that when more
people
start
using the
bicycle
the society becomes healthier. As cycling is a
good
physical activity,
people
who
regularly
use
bicycle
to commute stay healthy and this will motivate others to adopt this practice.

On the
other
hand, others contend that improving
public
transport
networks through enhanced funding by the
state
will save
time
and
reduce
traffic congestion in cities. An efficient and affordable
transport
system
is considered
a boon to office goers and ordinary
people
as it saves much
time
which is
very
vital in their busy work schedule.
So
it is the responsibility of the
state
to allocate more funds for building an efficient
public
transport
system
. A
clear
example of this is the metro train service in Chennai which has
efficiently
reduced
the travel
time
by half for
people
travelling on it.
Moreover
, the provision of a
good
transport
system
in the cities
helps
to control the traffic congestion which
is considered
to be a mounting issue in most cities due to
urbanisation
and population outburst.

To sum up, after
analysing
the situation, it is not
hard
to
see
that both approaches have their merits. In my opinion, the
government
should encourage cycling and at the same
time
it should invest more in
public
transport
systems
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think that city governments should spend more money to promote bicycle use in cities. Others, however, believe that cities should focus on investing in public transportation systems like trains or buses.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
341 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts