Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think that children under 18 years old should revise full time job.

Some people think that children under 18 years old should revise full time job. YB1EB

Many suggest that students have to be acquired full time classes until the age of 18. From my point view, Economically viable this mandate is sustainable. Actually, it is impossible to be taught young children in rural areas. Firstly in the countryside people hardly sustain the life balance. Because of low income or poor harvest. For example we can take developing nations which are living in Asia countries. on the other hand, parents enforce their children to work for raise crops and livestock Therefore parents cannot afford their family. Evenin some countries children look after cattle at early ages instead of learning priamry science. As a result in rural areas teens have not gain modern knowledge compared to cities teens. However there can be a variety of talented teenagers spend their life witout knowing the real world facts. So the lifestyle is not improved and infrastructure is poor. Recently years people begin to aware of ideal world sources. For this reason They send their sons to cities to earn more money feel the real society and broaden ones horizon. The main reason to support compulosry full-time education to the age of 18 is leading limitless opportunities in an evolving world. Imagine if our teenagers comprehend how to run industrial machines for our fields they could create wellfare society at far places from city centers. In conclusion. Despite the valid reason that are exist in rural communities to de-emphasize education. It is worthwhile to motiviate pupils of villages to learn and gain all about science. This is the most substantial matter to save our world.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
Many
 suggest that students This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
be acquired
 full time classes until the age of 18. From my point view, Economically
 viable this mandate is sustainable. Actually, it is impossible to be taught
 young children in rural areas. Firstly
 in the countryside This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 hardly sustain the life balance. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 of low income or poor harvest. For The comma is probably missing here: "example, we".example, we
example we
 can take developing nations which are living in Asia countries. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterOn
on
 the other hand, parents enforce their children to work for raise crops and livestock Therefore
 parents cannot afford their family. Possible spelling mistake found.EveningEven in
Evenin
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 countries children look after cattle at early ages instead
 of learning Possible spelling mistake found.primary
priamry
 science. “As” at the beginning of a sentence usually requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As
 a result in rural areas teens have not gain modern knowledge compared to cities teens. Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?However,
However
 there can be a variety of talented This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :juvenilesadolescents
teenagers
 spend their life Possible spelling mistake found.withoutwit out
witout
 knowing the real You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 facts. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 the lifestyle is not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :ameliorated
improved
 and infrastructure is poor. Recently years This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 to aware of ideal You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
 sources. For this reason
 They This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :transmit
send
 their sons to cities to earn more money feel the real society and broaden Did you mean "one's"?one's
ones
 horizon. The main reason to support Possible spelling mistake found.compulsory
compulosry
 full-time education to the age of 18 is leading limitless opportunities in an evolving You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
. Imagine if our This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :juvenilesadolescents
teenagers
 comprehend how to run industrial machines for our fields they could create Possible spelling mistake found.welfarewell fare
wellfare
 society at far places from city centers. In conclusion
. Despite the valid reason that are Consider using a past participle here: "existed".existed
exist
 in rural communities to de-emphasize education. It is worthwhile to Possible spelling mistake found.motivate
motiviate
 pupils of villages to learn and gain all about science. This is the most substantial matter to save our You use this word too often, consider replacing it withearthnature
world
. 