Many suggest that students have to be acquired full time classes until the age of 18. From my point view, Economically viable this mandate is sustainable. Actually, it is impossible to be taught young children in rural areas. Firstly in the countryside people hardly sustain the life balance. Because of low income or poor harvest. For example we can take developing nations which are living in Asia countries. on the other hand, parents enforce their children to work for raise crops and livestock Therefore parents cannot afford their family. Evenin some countries children look after cattle at early ages instead of learning priamry science. As a result in rural areas teens have not gain modern knowledge compared to cities teens. However there can be a variety of talented teenagers spend their life witout knowing the real world facts. So the lifestyle is not improved and infrastructure is poor. Recently years people begin to aware of ideal world sources. For this reason They send their sons to cities to earn more money feel the real society and broaden ones horizon. The main reason to support compulosry full-time education to the age of 18 is leading limitless opportunities in an evolving world. Imagine if our teenagers comprehend how to run industrial machines for our fields they could create wellfare society at far places from city centers. In conclusion. Despite the valid reason that are exist in rural communities to de-emphasize education. It is worthwhile to motiviate pupils of villages to learn and gain all about science. This is the most substantial matter to save our world.
Many
suggest that students
have to
be acquired
full time classes until the age of 18. From my point view,
Economically
viable this mandate is sustainable. Actually, it is impossible to
be taught
young children in rural areas.
Firstly
in the countryside
people
hardly sustain the life balance.
Because
of low income or poor harvest. For
example we
can take developing nations which are living in Asia countries.
on
the other hand, parents enforce their children to work for raise crops and livestock
Therefore
parents cannot afford their family.
Evenin
some
countries children look after cattle at early ages
instead
of learning
priamry
science.
As
a result in rural areas teens have not gain modern knowledge compared to cities teens.
However
there can be a variety of talented
teenagers
spend their life
witout
knowing the real
world
facts.
So
the lifestyle is not
improved
and infrastructure is poor. Recently years
people
begin
to aware of ideal
world
sources.
For this reason
They
send
their sons to cities to earn more money feel the real society and broaden
ones
horizon. The main reason to support
compulosry
full-time education to the age of 18 is leading limitless opportunities in an evolving
world
. Imagine if our
teenagers
comprehend how to run industrial machines for our fields they could create
wellfare
society at far places from city centers.
In conclusion
. Despite the valid reason that are
exist
in rural communities to de-emphasize education. It is worthwhile to
motiviate
pupils of villages to learn and gain all about science. This is the most substantial matter to save our
world
.