Nowadays, a number of people reckon that studying motherland history plays a much more significant role for undergraduate than world history lessons. From my point of view, the world-historical experience which is transferring through school’s lesson can teach contemporary youth better than if they learn the history by example only their own country.
On the one hand, people point out that historical knowledge of their country teaches adolescents to consider all previous mistakes and achievements. Country legacy, cultural norms, and traditions from the previous generation are able to give abundance numbers of remarkable practical lessons which could be applied within a country for its prosperous future. Furthermore, this heritage knowledge will help to avoid various civil conflicts or even wars. The proponents of this opinion think if each pupil knows his homeland history, he will care and protect it all his life.
On the other hand, world history includes an endless number of wise decisions from numerous generations and accordingly can incredibly extend horizons of understanding world problems from the current graduate. This world practice will help them not only find always the right solution but also avoid military conflicts. Apparently, our world has become so accessible due to the cutting-edge technology and it is simply unacceptable to allow our children to live with strict historical knowledge.
To conclude, despite the fact that some individuals insist on the priority of studying history only their own country at school, other people try to convince that world-historical experience hands to our kids much useful information for their further development. I definitely belong to followers of studying world history and believe that world-historical knowledge includes answers to all questions and it will help cope with all obstacles our children in the future. 
Nowadays, a number of  
people
 reckon that studying motherland  
history
 plays a much more significant role for undergraduate than  
world
  history
 lessons. From my point of view, the world-historical experience which is transferring through school’s lesson can teach contemporary youth better than if they learn the  
history
 by example  
only
 their  
own
 country.
On the one hand,  
people
 point out that historical knowledge of their  
country
 teaches adolescents to consider all previous mistakes and achievements.  
Country
 legacy, cultural norms, and traditions from the previous generation are able to give abundance numbers of remarkable practical lessons which could  
be applied
 within a  
country
 for its prosperous future.  
Furthermore
, this heritage knowledge will  
help
 to avoid various civil conflicts or even wars. The proponents of this opinion  
think
 if each pupil knows his homeland  
history
, he will care and protect it all his life. 
On the other hand
,  
world
  history
 includes an endless number of wise decisions from numerous generations and  
accordingly
 can  
incredibly
 extend horizons of understanding  
world
 problems from the  
current
 graduate. This  
world
 practice will  
help
 them not  
only
 find always the right solution  
but
  also
 avoid military conflicts.  
Apparently
, our  
world
 has become  
so
 accessible due to the cutting-edge technology and it is  
simply
 unacceptable to  
allow
 our children to  
live
 with strict historical knowledge. 
To conclude
, despite the fact that  
some
 individuals insist on the priority of studying  
history
  only
 their  
own
  country
 at school, other  
people
 try to convince that world-historical experience hands to our kids much useful information for their  
further
 development. I definitely belong to followers of studying  
world
  history
 and believe that world-historical knowledge includes answers to all questions and it will  
help
 cope with all obstacles our children in the future.