Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Due to increase use of aeroplane, air pollution is increasing more and more airports are constructed. Some people say that government should reduce air traffic by taxing it heavily. Do you agree or disagree?

Due to increase use of aeroplane, air pollution is increasing more and more airports are constructed. Some people say that government should reduce air traffic by taxing it heavily. pRaQw

Airways are the modern form of transport for people to move from one place to another as it reduces time, money and energy. Certain people argue that airways are causing more air pollution than ever before but I strongly disagree with this statement and in this essay, I will support my opinion with examples. Firstly, aeroplanes are not the predominant cause of air pollution. For instance, think of it this way, if people were forced to use roadways for moving thousands of miles then imagine the cost of fuel and time wasted towards that. Also, imposing a tax would lead to the usage of airways only by elite people which would not be a great idea. Moreover, increasing tax would put significant stress on Indian tourism as people would prefer touring with other means of transport. Another reason why I disagree is that, if pollution is the problem, we need to resort to ways in which we could curb the environmental damage, instead of imposing a tax on airfare. For instance, the government should invest more into the research of biofuel or electric fuel which would actually save the environment as well as the time and energy of the people. Finally, the modern style of transport is causing some environmental problems but the solution would be to find an alternative way to overcome the issue with advanced technology and solutions. Raising the tariff would eventually put a hole in common man's pocket and will put the country in the back foot rather than developing further.

Airways are the modern form of transport for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :relocate
move
 from one place to another as it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :alleviates
reduces
 time, money and energy. Certain You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 argue that airways are causing more air pollution than ever This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:previouslyprior to
before
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 I Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphstrongly.strongly!strongly?strongly:strongly,strongly;
strongly


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterDisagree
disagree
 with this statement and in this essay, I will support my opinion with examples.

Firstly
, Possible spelling mistake. 'aeroplanes' is British English.airplanes
aeroplanes
 are not the predominant cause of air pollution.

For instance
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 of it this way, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
were forced
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 roadways for moving thousands of miles then imagine the cost of fuel and time wasted towards that. Also
, imposing a tax would lead to the usage of airways This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 by elite You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 which would not be a great This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
. Moreover
, increasing tax would put significant This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accentuate
stress
 on Indian tourism as You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 would prefer touring with other means of transport.

Another reason why I disagree is that, if pollution is the problem, we need to resort to ways in which we could curb the environmental damage, instead
 of imposing a tax on airfare. For instance
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 should invest more into the research of biofuel or electric fuel which would actually save the environment as well
 as the time and energy of the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
.

Finally
, the modern style of transport is causing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 environmental problems This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 the solution would be to find an alternative way to overcome the issue with advanced technology and solutions. Raising the tariff would eventually
 put a hole Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphin.in!in?in:in,in;
in


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterCommon
common
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualresidentcitizen
man
's pocket and will put the country in the back foot rather
 than developing further
. 