There are split opinions regarding reusing the items and ignoring waste. A few sections of society believe that adolescent must be taught at school to recycle the materials. Whereas another group of thinkers support that parents should teach this at the house. However, both has its own pros and cons. Therefore, before commenting on my decision, both the opinion would be discussed.
Examining the former opinion, the primary argument the supporters put forward is that children are spending 90% of their time at the learning center or educational institution. Therefore, tutors are getting ample of time with their students. So, they should teach the hierarchy process to reuse the materials as an ad-hock on top of the syllabus. To exemplify this point, we can consider the schools in Mumbai, where all the staffs were volunteered themselves to spread the awareness about the re-manufacture of waste materials at school.
In Contrast, the latter view suggests that parents should teach the steps involved in recycling the material to their children. In other words, from the beginning, foster parents or guardians must teach ground rules to their kids. So, they will follow the procedure and stick to the code of conduct. As a result, all the children will follow patterns of behaviours throughout their life time. To justify, I would quote an example of the children in the USA who are still following the basic rules and other protocols such as recycling waste items into the handcraft materials. They acquire additional knowledge from their parents.
To conclude and give my opinion, I certainly vote for the latter group
There
are split
opinions
regarding reusing the items and ignoring waste. A few sections of society believe that adolescent
must
be taught
at school to recycle the
materials
.
Whereas
another group of thinkers
support
that parents should
teach
this at the
house
.
However
, both has its
own
pros and cons.
Therefore
,
before
commenting on my decision, both the
opinion
would
be discussed
.
Examining the former
opinion
, the primary argument the supporters put forward is that
children
are spending 90% of their time at the learning center or educational institution.
Therefore
, tutors are getting ample of time with their students.
So
, they should
teach
the hierarchy process to reuse the
materials
as an ad-hock on top of the syllabus. To exemplify this point, we can consider the schools in Mumbai, where all the staffs
were volunteered
themselves to spread the awareness about the re-manufacture of waste
materials
at school.
In Contrast
, the latter view suggests that parents should
teach
the steps involved in recycling the
material
to their
children
.
In other words
, from the beginning, foster parents or guardians
must
teach
ground
rules
to their kids.
So
, they will follow the procedure and stick to the code of conduct.
As a result
, all the
children
will follow patterns of
behaviours
throughout their
life time
. To justify, I would quote an example of the
children
in the USA who are
still
following the basic
rules
and other protocols such as recycling waste items into the handcraft
materials
. They acquire additional knowledge from their parents.
To conclude
and give my
opinion
, I
certainly
vote for the latter group