The debate on weather theoretical subjects are more important or practical are more important has been raging for ages. Some individuals are of the opinion that pupils should be taught more practical courses like computers but others hold the view that theoretical subjects are more important. In this essay I intend to discuss both views and finally give my opinion.
Those in favour of theoretical courses say that to be practically successful we need to have a strong and solid theoretical foundation. Though practically counts but it is like half knowledge if no theoretical knowledge is gained. Moreover, theory provides powerful tools to deal with the world around us and the body within ourselves. For example, medical theories help us combat diseases, economic theories explain inflation and unemployment, gravity theory explains the presence of planets. Even marketing which was once thought to be purely practical is based on statistical data which require mathematics knowledge.
Those who advocate practical courses say so because today is the era of computers and technology. They feel that such subjects have more job opportunities. What they don't take into consideration is that as far as the basic knowledge of such subjects is there it is all practical. But if you have to go into computer programming, you need to have your mathematical concepts clear.
In my opinion, both practical and theoretical subjects go ahead in hand and each has their own significance. Theory and practical are interrelated. Theory is the basic off all practical knowledge. For instance, a person becomes a doctor in five and a half years, which has four and a half theory plus one year practical. So, for the overall development of the students a mix of all subjects should be there.
To sum up, it can be said that both theory and practical subjects have their own importance. Both should be incorporated in the school and university curricula.
The debate on weather
theoretical
subjects
are more
important
or
practical
are more
important
has been raging for ages.
Some
individuals are of the opinion that pupils should
be taught
more
practical
courses like computers
but
others hold the view that
theoretical
subjects
are more
important
. In this essay I intend to discuss both views and
finally
give my opinion.
Those in
favour
of
theoretical
courses say that to be
practically
successful we need to have a strong and solid
theoretical
foundation. Though
practically
counts
but
it is like half
knowledge
if no
theoretical
knowledge
is gained
.
Moreover
,
theory
provides powerful tools to deal with the world around us and the body within ourselves.
For example
, medical
theories
help
us combat diseases, economic
theories
explain
inflation and unemployment, gravity
theory
explains
the presence of planets. Even marketing which was once
thought
to be
purely
practical
is based
on statistical data which require mathematics knowledge.
Those who advocate
practical
courses say
so
because
today
is the era of computers and technology. They feel that such
subjects
have more job opportunities. What they don't take into consideration is that as far as the basic
knowledge
of such
subjects
is there it is all
practical
.
But
if you
have to
go into computer programming, you need to have your mathematical concepts
clear
.
In my opinion, both
practical
and
theoretical
subjects
go ahead in hand and each has their
own
significance.
Theory
and
practical
are interrelated
.
Theory
is the basic off all
practical
knowledge
.
For instance
, a person becomes a doctor in five and a half years, which has four and a half
theory
plus one year
practical
.
So
, for the
overall
development of the students a mix of all
subjects
should be there.
To sum up, it can
be said
that both
theory
and
practical
subjects
have their
own
importance. Both should
be incorporated
in the school and university curricula.