Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

People hold divergent opinions about where to live. Some citizens prefer to live in cities with high-rise buildings while others believe cities with more flat buildings are better for residents

People hold divergent opinions about where to live. Some citizens prefer to live in cities with high-rise buildings while others believe cities with more flat buildings are better for residents ljL2K

Much space can be saved if people live in skyscrapers. As is commonly known, there is a rising demand for housing in many countries, especially in countries with large population like China and India. The land is so limited that people must make the best of it. In this case, constructing more tall buildings is a perfect way to achieve efficient land use. Apart from this, it also adds to the appearance of a city, creating an impressive skyline. Cities like New York and Shanghai are famous for their lively skyline. On the other hand, it is also understandable why some people prefer to live in cities with few high-rise buildings. Skyscrapers look modern but impersonal and some people feel disconnected from nature when living in buildings made from glass and steel. By contrast, quite a number of low-rise buildings are old buildings of cultural significance and people living in them feel more connected to the past. The Siheyuan (quadrangle courtyard) in Beijing is a typical example of this kind of building. In my viewpoint, both kinds of buildings are needed to cater for the changing demand of modern life. In terms of recreational areas and commercial districts, where overcrowding has become a problem, there should be more skyscrapers while regarding the residential areas, I believe living in low-rise buildings is better. The function and comfort level should be taken into consideration when city planners design the city.

Much space can be saved
 if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in skyscrapers. As is commonly
 known, there is a rising demand for housing in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
 countries, especially
 in countries with large population like China and India. The land is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 limited that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 the best of it. In this case
, constructing more tall You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 is a perfect way to achieve efficient land This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
. Apart from this, it also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accrues
adds
 to the appearance of a city, creating an impressive skyline. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
Cities
 like New York and Shanghai are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:well-known
famous
 for their lively skyline.

On the other hand
, it is also
 understandable why This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 prefer to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmetropoliscentermunicipalitydowntownplacecapital
cities
 with few high-rise You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
. Skyscrapers look modern This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 impersonal and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 feel disconnected from nature when living in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 made from glass and steel. By contrast, quite a number of low-rise You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ancientagedmature
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 of cultural significance and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 living in them feel more connected to the past. The Possible spelling mistake found.Saharan
Siheyuan
 (quadrangle courtyard) in Beijing is a typical example of this kind of building.

In my viewpoint, both kinds of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
are needed
 to cater for the changing demand of modern life. In terms of recreational areas and commercial districts, where overcrowding has become a problem, there should be more skyscrapers while regarding the residential areas, I believe living in low-rise You use this word too often, consider replacing it withhuthouseconstructionarchitecturehome
buildings
 is better. The function and comfort level should be taken
 into consideration when city planners design the city. 