Some people put value on the consistency in the design of local houses, while others counter that they have the right to build houses on their way. I personally reckon that each option has its own ample benefits, which would be respectively crystalised in the following essay.
Advantages of the idea that buildings in a local area are look-alike are not negligible. To begin with, this contributes to form a unique feature and the general aestheticism of the whole place. For example, in this day and age, newly built houses in Tay Nguyen province still follow an old pattern called “nha san”, in which houses are totally made of wood and built on tall columns, by which people have preserved their cultural value and gained lots of popularity among tourism unexpectedly. Besides, having similar houses could create an equal and sociable atmosphere among neighbors. Consequently, it could bridge the gap among people from different socioeconomic statuses and facilitate interpersonal communication in the resident.
On the other hand, citizens should not be confined if they intend to construct houses in their own styles. First, not only is a house an accomodation, but it is also a home for an individual or their family for a long time. Owners should be free to have a dream house that brings them a sense of belonging, rather than a place that they are not attached to. Second, should a person draw his own housing plan, he can set up a house that is within his reach, instead of being forced to follow costly houses of people around. Because people have different financial backgrounds, this option gives them various chances to choose reasonably.
In conclusion, both opinions have upside and are worth following. While the former idea might help the area become more aesthetically pleasing and minimize the wealth gap, the latter seems essential to each individual’s affordability and suit their favourite.
Some
people
put value on the consistency in the design of local
houses
, while others counter that they have the right to build
houses
on their way. I
personally
reckon that each option has its
own
ample benefits, which would be
respectively
crystalised
in the following essay.
Advantages of the
idea
that buildings in a local area are look-alike are not negligible. To
begin
with, this contributes to form a unique feature and the general aestheticism of the whole place.
For example
, in this day and age,
newly
built
houses
in
Tay
Nguyen province
still
follow an
old
pattern called “
nha
san
”, in which
houses
are
totally
made of wood and built on tall columns, by which
people
have preserved their cultural value and gained lots of popularity among tourism
unexpectedly
.
Besides
, having similar
houses
could create an equal and sociable atmosphere among neighbors.
Consequently
, it could bridge the gap among
people
from
different
socioeconomic statuses and facilitate interpersonal communication in the resident.
On the other hand
, citizens should not
be confined
if they intend to construct
houses
in their
own
styles.
First
, not
only
is a
house
an
accomodation
,
but
it is
also
a home for an individual or their family for a long time. Owners should be free to have a dream
house
that brings them a sense of belonging,
rather
than a place that they are not attached to. Second, should a person draw his
own
housing plan, he can set up a
house
that is
within his reach,
instead
of
being forced
to follow costly
houses
of
people
around.
Because
people
have
different
financial backgrounds, this option gives them various chances to choose
reasonably
.
In conclusion
, both opinions have upside and are worth following. While the former
idea
might
help
the area become more
aesthetically
pleasing and minimize the wealth gap, the latter seems essential to each individual’s affordability and suit their
favourite
.