Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

some people think, it's better to choose friends who alwayys have same opinions as them. other thinks its good to have those who sometimes disagrees with them. discuss both the views and given your own opinion with own experience.

some people think, it's better to choose friends who alwayys have same opinions as them. other thinks its good to have those who sometimes disagrees with them. NWBDm

Some people believe that, the type of friend circle one has decides the nature and future of him/her. And some can be of same and/or different opinions, so let's look at both the sides of having one or both type of persons in a group. Suppose, you have mates of similar opinions only, then you get restricted with respect to single perspective of any decision and so it can limit your thought process and one cannot have broad view of situation. And, if all companions are of opposite thinking, then it might harm your right decision because disagreeing atmosphere of a group may lead to wrong solution with taking care of your alternatives. For example if you want to start a venture, buddies may demotivate you and you might end up doing nothing, which is not healthy. On the contrary, it is advisable to have combination of both, due to the fact that, agreeing and disagreeing sides of any problem always have satisfactorily optimized results. I would like to throw some light on this aspect by giving my personal experience, when I applied for IELTS and planned for working abroad, I was quite unsure with decisions but as I have both type of best friends, they helped me to look at both the sides of coin and it supported me to finalize my thought. In conclusion, it’s always good to have all types of colleague in your team and if not you can ask them for counter situations as well.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 believe that, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsortcategorybreedgroupdescriptionform
type
 of friend circle one has decides the nature and future of him/her. And This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 can be of same and/or This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 opinions, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :authorize
let
's look at both the sides of having one or both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsortcategorybreedgroupdescriptionform
type
 of persons in a group.

Suppose, you have mates of similar opinions This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
, then you This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 restricted with respect to single perspective of any decision and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 it can limit your This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
 process and one cannot have broad view of situation.

And, if all companions are of opposite thinking, then it might harm your right decision This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 disagreeing atmosphere of a group may lead to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
 solution with taking care of your alternatives. For example
 if you want to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiate
start
 a venture, buddies may demotivate you and you might This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 up doing nothing, which is not healthy.

On the contrary
, it is advisable to have combination of both, due to the fact that, agreeing and disagreeing sides of any problem always have satisfactorily
 optimized results. I would like to throw This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 light on this aspect by giving my personal experience, when I applied for IELTS and planned for working abroad, I was quite unsure with decisions This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 as I have both You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsortcategorybreedgroupdescriptionform
type
 of best friends, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assisted
helped
 me to look at both the sides of coin and it supported me to finalize my This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonedassumedbelievedconsidered
thought
.

In conclusion
, it’s always This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 to have all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsortcategorybreedgroupdescriptionform
types
 of colleague in your team and if not you can ask them for counter situations as well
. 