In recent days, choosing friends is becoming popular topic. A school of thought believes that it's better to have friends with the people who have same kind of thoughts as them while others disagree with this. This essay will discuss why it is good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them rather than having friends with same wavelength.
There are various benefits of having friends with same opinions. Firstly, people who are having friends with same thought will have better understanding on each others. They may understand each others move and supports in all aspects. In addition, people may feel free to share their personal problems. Secondly, friends with same wavelength may have longer friendship. For instance, a recent study says, seven years of friendship may last long till last breath and this has seen with people who have friends with same opinions. To sum up, friends with same mentality may last longer and build good trust among themselves.
On other hand, despite having friends with same opinions, there are many benefits of having friends who sometimes disgree with them. Firstly, people will get different set of solutions for a problem when they have taken the problem to friends who have different opinions. In addition, friends with different nature of thought brings learning to each other when they discuss about a topic. For instance, a recent study says, a group of scientist with different opinions has invented many more inventions in a short duration. In conclusion, friends with different opinions may have good number of benefits including helping to give solutions in different angle for problems.
Lastly, is choosing friends with same opinions still good? This essay has discussed why choosing friends from different wavelength has good benefits over having friend with same opinions. In my opinion, friends with different nature may disagree sometimes on each others views but there are many scope of learning and exposure among themselves.
In recent days, choosing
friends
is becoming popular topic. A school of
thought
believes that it's better to have
friends
with the
people
who
have same kind of
thoughts
as them while others disagree with this. This essay will discuss why it is
good
to have
friends
who
sometimes
disagree with them
rather
than
having
friends
with same wavelength.
There are various
benefits
of
having
friends
with same
opinions
.
Firstly
,
people
who
are
having
friends
with same
thought
will have better understanding on each
others
. They may understand each
others
move
and supports in all aspects.
In addition
,
people
may feel free to share their personal problems.
Secondly
,
friends
with same wavelength may have longer friendship.
For instance
, a recent study says, seven years of friendship may last long till last breath and this has
seen
with
people
who
have
friends
with same
opinions
. To sum up,
friends
with same mentality may last longer and build
good
trust among themselves.
On
other
hand, despite
having
friends
with same
opinions
, there are
many
benefits
of
having
friends
who
sometimes
disgree
with them.
Firstly
,
people
will
get
different
set of solutions for a problem when they have taken the problem to
friends
who
have
different
opinions
.
In addition
,
friends
with
different
nature of
thought
brings learning to each
other
when they
discuss about a
topic.
For instance
, a recent study says, a group of scientist with
different
opinions
has invented
many
more inventions in a short duration.
In conclusion
,
friends
with
different
opinions
may have
good
number of
benefits
including helping to give solutions in
different
angle for problems.
Lastly
, is choosing
friends
with same
opinions
still
good
? This essay has discussed why choosing
friends
from
different
wavelength has
good
benefits
over
having
friend
with same
opinions
. In my
opinion
,
friends
with
different
nature may disagree
sometimes
on each others views
but
there are
many scope
of learning and exposure among themselves.