Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think it is important to keep and maintain old buildings rather than replace them with modern building.

Some people think it is important to keep and maintain old buildings rather than replace them with modern building. QLllb
The question of replacing old houses with new ones is highly topical nowadays. It is considered by the great part of the society that everything should be renovated and refreshed including edifices. Their opponents claim that old constructions can possess crucial value for the culture, on the one hand, and are still occupied by people living in them. I prefer to agree with the latter point. It's not a secret that constructions tend to be crashed and dilapidated over time. They change their shape becoming unsuitable for living and that is the first reason why they should be replaced with time. For example, if the roof of the construction is erased because of enduring action of sun or moisture this building cannot be exploited with the purpose of living. The next reason is the aesthetician one. Some buildings can be so ugly and unattractive that they just cannot answer new demands and tastes. Examples of those are soviet standard panel or brick residential 5-floors buildings, which are called "khrushchevki", which were built with thoughts of everything but aesthetic. However, not all edifices deserve reconstruction or demolition. Some of them might be either of cultural significance or of a historical one. As an example, we can take printing yard on Nikolskaya Street in Moscow. It's a house that was constructed in the 19th century and this fact can be noticed if we look at the backside of the construction. It looks extremely decrepit and rundown in the background but this dilapidation has its own charm and emphasizes how ancient the building is. So, in my opinion, it should not be reconstructed or even restored. Furthermore, there might be not only historical or cultural reasons but humanistic ones. For instance, the building can be inhabited by families living there for years and refusing to leave their places. Of course, their desires should be taken into account as well. In many cases, it seems more rational to allow these people to stay in old edificies rather than organize their resettlement for financial reasons or for others. To conclude, the answer to the question about managing the destinies of old constructions cannot be concrete and explicit. The decision to maintain old houses or to replace them with new ones should be based on common sense. However, I strongly believe that if there is an opportunity to preserve ancient constructions it should be done to save cultural heritage.
The question of replacing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
with new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
is
highly
topical nowadays. It
is considered
by the great part of the society that everything should
be renovated
and refreshed including edifices. Their opponents claim that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
can possess crucial value for the culture, on the one hand, and are
still
occupied by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
in them. I prefer to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agree
with the latter point.

It's not a secret that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
tend to
be crashed
and dilapidated over time. They
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
their shape becoming unsuitable for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
and
that is
the
first
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
why they should
be replaced
with time.
For example
, if the roof of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construction
is erased
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of enduring action of sun or moisture this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
cannot
be exploited
with the purpose of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
. The
next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reason
is the
Possible spelling mistake found.
aesthetician
one.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
can be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
ugly and unattractive that they
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
cannot answer new demands and tastes. Examples of those are soviet standard panel or brick residential 5-floors
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
buildings
, which
are called
Use a smart opening quote here: "“".
"
Possible spelling mistake found.
khrushchevki
Use a smart closing quote here: "”".
"
, which
were built
with thoughts of everything
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
aesthetic.

However
, not all edifices deserve reconstruction or demolition.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
of them might be either of cultural significance or of a historical one. As an example, we can take printing yard on
Possible spelling mistake found.
Nikolskaya
Street in Moscow. It's a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
that
was constructed
in the 19th century and this fact can
be noticed
if we look at the backside of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
construction
. It looks
extremely
decrepit and rundown in the background
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
this dilapidation has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
charm and emphasizes how ancient the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
is.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
, in my opinion, it should not
be reconstructed
or even restored.
Furthermore
, there might be not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
historical or cultural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reasons
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
humanistic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
.
For instance
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
building
can
be inhabited
by families
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
living
there for years and refusing to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
leave
their places.
Of course
, their desires should
be taken
into account
as well
. In
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
cases, it seems more rational to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
these
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
to stay in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
Possible spelling mistake found.
edificies
rather
than organize their resettlement for financial
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reasons
or for others.

To conclude
, the answer to the question about managing the destinies of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
cannot be concrete and explicit. The decision to maintain
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
old
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
or to replace them with new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
ones
should
be based
on common sense.
However
, I
strongly
believe that if there is an opportunity to preserve ancient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
constructions
it should
be done
to save cultural heritage.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people think it is important to keep and maintain old buildings rather than replace them with modern building.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
403 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts