Every place has its own pros and cons. Cities and Remote places both have their own ways in shaping kids development. At the end of the day its parents choice to decide which is better for their kids during early years. The essay will put special focus on good and Bad of both places.
Life in Metropolitan area is fast, Raising kids there has it's own perks. Firstly there are plenty of high class Early child education institutes. Transportation to the schools is better hence their is no issue for parents to send their kids to the school even if it's a long drive.
Secondly a lot of big cities have plenty of museums, kids visiting there on weekends can enlighten them with essential history, They learn about art and culture. Thus such visits make them familiar to their own roots.
On the other hand suburbs have lots of drawbacks. Living there is usually very expensive, Rent of apartments is sky rocking, More over there are increase incidence of petty crimes and Also the concern of pollution.
Turning to Rural life, It's usually calm and simple. Not many people inhabiting these places. Hence less chances of Crime and Pollution. What is more kids can really experience the lush green nature and Understand the importance of saving the nature also they can go for outdoor activities like hiking or Play in the parks which is very essential for growing kids. Above all it's extremely cheap to live in remote places, Rents and buying goods is usually far better than the cities due to low taxes.
As far as downside of living in village is mainly lack of infrastructure, For example they lack proper schools, Hospital and Transportation. These areas are mostly underfunded consequently lack good education and health and other services.
In conclusion cities are good with respect to quality of education and Diversity but are extremely expensive on other hand agrarian areas are much cheaper and Rich in natural beauty but lacks infrastructure and facilities, At the end of the day it's personal choice where we choose to raise our kids.
Every
place
has its
own
pros and cons.
Cities
and Remote
places
both have their
own
ways in shaping
kids
development. At the
end
of the day its parents choice to decide which is better for their
kids
during early years. The essay will put special focus on
good
and
Bad
of both places.
Life in Metropolitan area is
fast
, Raising
kids
there has
it's
own
perks.
Firstly
there are
plenty
of high
class
Early child education institutes. Transportation to the schools is better
hence
their
is no issue for parents to
send
their
kids
to the school even if
it's
a long drive.
Secondly
a lot of
big
cities
have
plenty
of museums,
kids
visiting there on weekends can enlighten them with essential history, They learn about art and culture.
Thus
such visits
make
them familiar to their
own
roots.
On the other hand
suburbs have lots of drawbacks. Living there is
usually
very
expensive, Rent of apartments is sky rocking, More over there are increase incidence of petty crimes and
Also
the concern of pollution.
Turning to Rural life,
It's
usually
calm and simple. Not
many
people
inhabiting these
places
.
Hence
less
chances of Crime and Pollution.
What is more
kids
can
really
experience the lush green nature and Understand the importance of saving the nature
also
they can go for outdoor activities like hiking or Play in the parks which is
very
essential for growing
kids
.
Above all
it's
extremely
cheap
to
live
in remote
places
, Rents and buying
goods
is
usually
far better than the
cities
due to low taxes.
As far as downside of living in village is
mainly
lack
of infrastructure,
For example
they
lack
proper schools, Hospital and Transportation. These areas are
mostly
underfunded
consequently
lack
good
education and health and other services.
In conclusion
cities
are
good
with respect to quality of education and Diversity
but
are
extremely
expensive on other hand agrarian areas are much cheaper and Rich in natural beauty
but
lacks
infrastructure and facilities, At the
end
of the day
it's
personal choice where we choose to raise our
kids
.