When it comes to the relationship between parents and teenagers, there is a debate on whether or not conflicts are necessary. While some people argue that those conflicts are part of the education process, others believe conflicts between parents and sons could be avoided. This essay discusses both sides and explains why I support the former opinion.
On the one hand, there are those who believe that conflicts are necessary because it is part of the upbringing. According to those people, those conflicts teach teenagers how to handle different opinions. This is because young adults are prone to think that they are right all the time, however, this is not the case, and the best people to convince them about their mistakes is their parents. In addition, conflicts are valuable to prepare young adults for life. To illustrate, recent research conducted by the University of California showed that ninety per cent of adults believe that their parents' corrections were vital to their success.
On the other hand, some experts believe that those conflicts should be avoided because it is harmful to parents and teens. They argue that conflicts create a worse relationship in family ties. In other words, they believe that conflicts are a threat to the well-being of a family. Furthermore, it is argued that if the idea is to teach young adults about something, there are better ways to achieve this goal. For example, an open discussion between family is much more useful than a conflict.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their merits. On balance, however, I feel that differences between teens and parents are valid. This is because I think some problems are not solved without a conflict and, therefore, it is needed.
When it
comes
to the relationship between
parents
and
teenagers
, there is a debate on
whether or not
conflicts
are necessary. While
some
people
argue that those
conflicts
are part of the education process, others
believe
conflicts
between
parents
and sons could
be avoided
. This essay discusses both sides and
explains
why I support the former opinion.
On the one hand, there are those who
believe
that
conflicts
are necessary
because
it is part of the upbringing. According to those
people
, those
conflicts
teach
teenagers
how to handle
different
opinions. This is
because
young
adults
are prone to
think
that they are right all the time,
however
, this is not the case, and the best
people
to convince them about their mistakes is their
parents
.
In addition
,
conflicts
are valuable to prepare young
adults
for life. To illustrate, recent research conducted by the University of California
showed
that ninety per cent of
adults
believe
that their parents' corrections were vital to their success.
On the other hand
,
some
experts
believe
that those
conflicts
should
be avoided
because
it is harmful to
parents
and teens. They argue that
conflicts
create a worse relationship in family ties.
In other words
, they
believe
that
conflicts
are a threat to the well-being of a family.
Furthermore
, it
is argued
that if the
idea
is to teach young
adults
about something, there are better ways to achieve this goal.
For example
, an open discussion between family is much more useful than a conflict.
In conclusion
, I
believe
both arguments have their merits. On balance,
however
, I feel that differences between teens and
parents
are valid. This is
because
I
think
some
problems are not solved without a
conflict
and,
therefore
, it
is needed
.