There are divided opinions regarding the environmental problems where a group state that extinction of the flora and fauna is the prime issue; while many counter-claim that other hurdles are more vital than it. Therefore, before commending on my point of view both the side of arguments would be elaborated further.
The proponents of the former part of the topic have their own arguments. To begin with, the loss of a particular species of plants and animals will lead to a detrimental impact on the eco-system. By this I mean, every species all around the world play a salient role in the food chain, and if one of them being lost so it directly affects on it. For example, in the past time, a number of plants disappear which are the staple food for bears consequently as of now bears are finding hurdles for their feeding, because of this nowadays this animal breeding is on the verge of extinction. However, those who support the latter part of the discussion advocate that most importantly, many problems such as air pollution as well as ozen layer depletion have an adverse impact on everyone's life. In other words, as compared to the past nowadays proportion of the carbon footprint in the environment escalated significantly which leads to air pollution and creates holes in ozen layer. As a result many animals finding problems in order to have fresh air, also especially humans due to the depletion of the ozen layer they are being exposed to harmful UV rays, by this they faced more health-related complications.
To conclude, arriving at my stand although many opine that the other environmental problems are more important, I believe that loss of the particular species is the main one. Due to the fact that this issue leads to a negative impact on the world's eco-system.
There
are divided
opinions regarding the environmental
problems
where a group state that extinction of the flora and fauna is the prime issue; while
many
counter-claim that other hurdles are more vital than it.
Therefore
,
before
commending on my point of view both the side of arguments would
be elaborated
further
.
The proponents of the former part of the topic have their
own
arguments. To
begin
with, the loss of a particular species of plants and animals will lead to a detrimental impact on the
eco-system
. By this I mean, every species all around the world play a salient role in the food chain, and if one of them
being lost
so
it
directly
affects on it.
For example
, in the
past time
, a number of plants disappear which are the staple food for bears
consequently
as of
now
bears are finding hurdles for their feeding,
because of this
nowadays this animal breeding is on the verge of extinction.
However
, those who support the latter part of the discussion advocate that most
importantly
,
many
problems
such as air pollution
as well
as
ozen
layer depletion have an adverse impact on everyone's life.
In other words
, as compared to the past nowadays proportion of the carbon footprint in the environment escalated
significantly
which leads to air pollution and creates holes in
ozen
layer.
As a result
many
animals finding
problems
in order to have fresh air,
also
especially
humans due to the depletion of the
ozen
layer they are
being exposed
to harmful UV rays, by this they faced more health-related complications.
To conclude
, arriving at my stand although
many
opine that the other environmental
problems
are more
important
, I believe that loss of the particular species is the main one. Due to the fact that this issue leads to a
negative
impact on the world's
eco-system
.