It is hard to overstate the importance of schooling: it decides what kind of person we become, what kind of career we will have, and ultimately what kind of life we will lead. Therefore, what should and should not be taught at school is necessarily a perennial debate. Some assert that schools should focus on disciplines that will be directly relevant to one's occupation in the future, while others state that courses like sports and music should also be included in the curriculum. Both viewpoints are justifiable, but I personally lean towards the latter. On the one hand, academic subjects are indeed very important. It could be said that the foremost objective of people who attend school is to have a financially viable career after they finish. To this end, the bulk of curriculum should be dedicated to core subjects like Maths, Science, and Language, whose performance is placed heavy emphasis by higher education institutions and employers alike. On the other hand, subjects like sports and music cannot be discounted altogether. While they may not be directly helpful in securing development, they indirectly make technical expertise and qualificaions of applicants and attach greater importance to attributea like adaptability, creavity and collaborative skills. These qualities are arguably better cultivated in experieces like playing music or competing in team sportes than in academic lessons. Anathor compelling reason why non-academic subjects should be taught at school is that it allow young takents in athletic and artistic fields to be discovered. Without the opportunity to participate in these activities at elementary or secondary level, musically inclined individuals or those who are endowned with an aptitude for sports will be denied the chance to achieve their full potential. In conclusion, academic subjects should no soubt be give precedence in school, but it is also important that students should be taught other subjects like music or sports.
It is
hard
to overstate the importance of schooling: it decides what kind of person we become, what kind of career we will have, and
ultimately
what kind of life we will lead.
Therefore
, what should and should not
be taught
at
school
is
necessarily
a perennial debate.
Some
assert that
schools
should focus on disciplines that will be
directly
relevant to one's occupation in the future, while others state that courses like
sports
and
music
should
also
be included
in the curriculum. Both viewpoints are justifiable,
but
I
personally
lean towards the latter. On the one hand, academic
subjects
are
indeed
very
important
. It could
be said
that the foremost objective of
people
who attend
school
is to have a
financially
viable career after they finish. To this
end
, the bulk of curriculum should
be dedicated
to core
subjects
like
Maths
, Science, and Language, whose performance
is placed
heavy emphasis by higher education institutions and employers alike.
On the other hand
,
subjects
like
sports
and
music
cannot
be discounted
altogether. While they may not be
directly
helpful in securing development, they
indirectly
make
technical expertise and
qualificaions
of applicants and attach greater importance to
attributea like
adaptability,
creavity
and collaborative
skills
. These qualities are
arguably
better cultivated in
experieces
like playing
music
or competing in team
sportes
than in academic lessons.
Anathor
compelling reason why non-academic
subjects
should
be taught
at
school
is that it
allow
young
takents
in athletic and artistic fields to
be discovered
. Without the opportunity to participate in these activities at elementary or secondary level,
musically
inclined individuals or those who are
endowned
with an aptitude for
sports
will
be denied
the chance to achieve their full potential.
In conclusion
, academic
subjects
should no
soubt
be give precedence in
school
,
but
it is
also
important
that students should
be taught
other
subjects
like
music
or
sports
.