Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people say that older, more traditional buildings in cities should be preserved. Others believe that these buildings should be demolished and new ones built in their place. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Some people say that older, more traditional buildings in cities should be preserved. Others believe that these buildings should be demolished and new ones built in their place. BJ6Rm
Like all things, traditional and modern buildings respectively serve their distinct purposes. Currently, however, the heat is rising in the arguments about whether traditional buildings are to be maintained or disposed of to make place for new constructions. From my point of view, both sides have their legit reasonings but at the same time unjust arguments. When it comes to traditional buildings, it does not come down as a surprise at all that many wish for them to be preserved. It is because these architectures are heritages, the tales of history, and often times they hold admirable aesthetic and artistic values. They are bridges that connect generations, displaying a crucial aspect of our predecessors’ lifestyle. All of these aspects make old buildings ideal tourist attractions. Take a look at the Colosseum in Rome for example. It is a grotesque structure that enabled historians and archeologists to study the trademarks of a remarkable lost culture of human history, all the while prospering its home country, Italy, from national and international tourism income every year. Thus, by keeping traditional buildings around, we not only have access to local cultural history but also benefit financially and academically. However, it is undeniable that the existence of these obsolete and perhaps run-down buildings may do us more harm than good. This is where modern buildings come into consideration. Compared to their traditional counterpart, new and modern buildings are much more convenient, flexible, and undoubtedly safer and more secured with the application of cutting-edge innovations and high-tech appliances. As they are built from tough and sustainable materials, these buildings do not require continual maintenance, meaning the cost to keep these blocks in full function can be cut down significantly. Furthermore, the rapid growth of globalization established a solid need for more of these buildings to be constructed, as most organizations and brands cannot risk their workers’ and products’ safety relying on old buildings. That is not to mention, the abolishment of traditional buildings and construction of new ones gives way to the flourishment of numerous industries, building material provision and designing for example, and overall is a magnificent aid for an economic boost. Yet, the art, legacy, and identity of these buildings are nowhere to be found. Imagine if the Eifel Tower was taken down to be replaced by a mall complex. Does the sound of that scenario seem exhilarating to you? I think not. In short, the construction of new buildings in place of traditional ones is a logical decision, but one that would result in a loss of mankind’s spiritual richness. So, what I believe we should do is make an effort in selective preservation. Determine if a traditional building is important enough to be maintained, and clear out ones that have met their limit to welcome modern buildings on board. Letting go of the past is not easy, but in order to move forward, rational choices must be made. In conclusion, the preservation of traditional buildings and the construction of new buildings are both necessary and should be carried out harmoniously with careful management.
Like all things,
traditional
and
modern
buildings
respectively
serve their distinct purposes.
Currently
,
however
, the heat is rising in the arguments about whether
traditional
buildings
are to
be maintained
or disposed of to
make
place for
new
constructions
. From my point of view, both sides have their legit
reasonings
but
at the same time unjust arguments.

When it
comes
to
traditional
buildings
, it does not
come
down as a surprise at all that
many wish
for them to
be preserved
. It is
because
these architectures are heritages, the tales of history, and
often
times they hold admirable aesthetic and artistic values. They are bridges that connect generations, displaying a crucial aspect of our predecessors’ lifestyle. All of these aspects
make
old
buildings
ideal tourist attractions. Take a look at the Colosseum in Rome
for example
. It is a grotesque structure that enabled historians and archeologists to study the trademarks of a remarkable lost culture of human history, all the while prospering its home country, Italy, from national and international tourism income every year.
Thus
, by keeping
traditional
buildings
around, we not
only
have access to local cultural history
but
also
benefit
financially
and
academically
.

However
, it is undeniable that the existence of these obsolete and perhaps run-down
buildings
may do us more harm than
good
. This is where
modern
buildings
come
into consideration. Compared to their
traditional
counterpart,
new
and
modern
buildings
are much more convenient, flexible, and
undoubtedly
safer and more secured with the application of cutting-edge innovations and high-tech appliances. As they
are built
from tough and sustainable materials, these
buildings
do not require continual maintenance, meaning the cost to
keep
these blocks in full function can be
cut
down
significantly
.
Furthermore
, the rapid growth of globalization established a solid need for more of these
buildings
to
be constructed
, as most organizations and brands cannot
risk
their workers’ and products’ safety relying on
old
buildings
.
That is
not to mention, the abolishment of
traditional
buildings
and
construction
of
new
ones
gives way to the
flourishment
of numerous industries,
building
material provision and designing
for example
, and
overall
is a magnificent aid for an economic boost.
Yet
, the art, legacy, and identity of these
buildings
are nowhere to
be found
. Imagine if the
Eifel
Tower
was taken
down to
be replaced
by a mall complex. Does the sound of that scenario seem exhilarating to you? I
think
not. In short, the
construction
of
new
buildings
in place of
traditional
ones
is a logical decision,
but
one that would result in a loss of mankind’s spiritual richness.

So
, what I believe we should do is
make
an effort in selective preservation. Determine if a
traditional
building
is
important
enough
to
be maintained
, and
clear
out
ones
that have met their limit to welcome
modern
buildings
on board. Letting go of the past is not easy,
but
in order to
move
forward, rational choices
must
be made
.
In conclusion
, the preservation of
traditional
buildings
and the
construction
of
new
buildings
are both necessary and should
be carried
out
harmoniously
with careful management.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people say that older, more traditional buildings in cities should be preserved. Others believe that these buildings should be demolished and new ones built in their place.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
511 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts
  • 6.5band
    Overpopulation is the world's most serious environmental problem. Give relevant examples from your knowledge and
    Outgrowing population is one of the serious concern for the environment. Major cause of this threat is growing poverty, illiteracy among people and many more, which can be sorted out if the government and people co-operate with each other. Major concerns  for overpopulation is poverty, due to which...
  • 5.5band
    We no longer pay attention to advertising?
    I think it is sure that We tend to buy something new by watching advertisements. Advertising has an effect on our shopping. It consists of great information which we interest in. When we get some information we want to buy by advertisements, our concern increases. So advertising is extremely success...
  • 6band
    Government should ban extreme sports.
    In sophisticated scenario, adventurous games are flourishing internationally with each passing day. However, it is often argued that these sports should be prohibited. Personally, I disagree with this ideology, and I believe that risky sports paly a vital role socially and economically for an engage...
  • 6band
    Advertising is in success
    There are two vies of advertising that it is successful and not in success. Former is logical. A lot of advertising agency have made a numerous profit recently. Later is not based on that fact. However, it is also the reality that we hardly respond to advertisements especially on the Internet owing ...
  • 6band
    What I think about advertising
    As you know, advertising is thought that it is meaningless due to their community, but I think it is not. When I see SNS, especially instagram, Twitter and Facebook, I am tempted by some of advertisement because they have been learning what I like or I might like so I take up my time a lot. In fact...
  • 5.5band
    Urban planning in Singapore
    British merchants established a trading post in Singapore in the early nineteenth century, and for more than a century trading interests dominated. However, in 1965 the newly independent island state was cut off from its hinterland, and so it set about pursuing a survival strategy. The good internat...