It is an ongoing debate between two groups of individuals. Former view states that industrial development is required to decrease a poorness. On the other hand, latter group thinks that it can cause damage to the nature and it should be restricted. Before giving my opinion, both views need to be critiqued with relevant examples in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Focusing on the former view, the foremost argument put forward by the people is that increase in the number of manufacturing plants is necessary to solve poverty. Destituteness has became a major issue for the developing countries such as, India. For example, there is one factory named 'IFFCO'. Which is situated near my hometown in a rular area. Mostly, all the workers of that company are belonging to that area. So that, it can decrease a poverty as well as an unemployment. Furthermore, industries can not be builded in the city or an urban places. Therefore, it is builded outside the city and provide jobs to the people of a surrounding places.
Contradictorily, it can cause a major damage to the environment. Firstly, for the construction of the plants it is mandatory to destroy forests or farms. Secondly, there are many waste materials which have been throwing outside and result in a damage of a nature. Moreover, it can lead a health problem to many workers. Additionally, it can pollute the air. Thereby, polluted air along with decreased amount of trees can also lower the oxygen level which leads to major issue.
To sum up and give my opinion, the industrial development is very beneficial for the population of poor people. It can help to decrease an unemployment and to increase the growth of the people who are poor. So that, it has very benefits which are capable to overcome the disadvantages of the same.
It is an ongoing debate between two groups of individuals. Former view states that industrial development
is required
to decrease a poorness.
On the other hand
, latter group
thinks
that it can cause damage to the nature and it should
be restricted
.
Before
giving my opinion, both views need to
be critiqued
with relevant examples in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Focusing on the former view, the foremost argument put forward by the
people
is
that increase in the number of manufacturing plants is necessary to solve poverty.
Destituteness
has
became
a major issue for the
developing countries
such as, India.
For example
, there is one factory named '
IFFCO
'.
Which
is situated
near my hometown in a
rular
area.
Mostly
, all the workers of that
company
are belonging
to that area.
So
that, it can decrease a poverty
as well
as an unemployment.
Furthermore
, industries can not be
builded
in the city or an urban
places
.
Therefore
, it is
builded
outside the city and provide jobs to the
people
of a surrounding places.
Contradictorily
, it can cause
a major damage
to the environment.
Firstly
, for the construction of the plants it is mandatory to
destroy
forests or farms.
Secondly
, there are
many
waste materials which have been throwing outside and result in a
damage of
a nature.
Moreover
, it can lead a health problem to
many
workers.
Additionally
, it can pollute the air. Thereby, polluted air along with decreased amount of trees can
also
lower the oxygen level which leads to major issue.
To sum up and give my opinion, the industrial development is
very
beneficial for the population of poor
people
. It can
help
to decrease an unemployment and to increase the growth of the
people
who are poor.
So
that, it has
very
benefits which are capable to overcome the disadvantages of the same.