Demand for new houses has significantly increased in many areas. This has started a new debate since countryside might be the only place which has enough land available to build these homes. While some people believe that protecting the existing countryside is essential rather than using it to construct new buildings, others might be against this notion. In my opinion, the argument regarding the protection of rural land is completely valid as building house there will lead to loss of agricultural land and trees.
Construction of houses in the countryside will reduce available agricultural land. Even though there is still plenty of land available for growing fruits and vegetables at the moment, this might be not the case if these areas are not protected. According to a recent study published online, a total 10 percent agricultural land across the world has severely been affected by the urbanization factor in the last five years, which has made it harder for many countries to meet rising demands of fresh products they produce. Therefore, in order to save the available agricultural land, building homes in the countryside should be discouraged.
Moreover, utilizing countryside space for living purposes can result in the loss of trees. In order to build houses in rural areas, most of the trees will need to be cleared; which can be very harmful for the environment. For instance, in a similar project undertaken by Pakistani authorities recently in order to provide public housing, almost sixteen thousand trees were removed. As it is a widely known fact that tree removal directly affect our environment causing global warming, countryside construction should not be allowed in any case.
In conclusion, many people believe that the land available in the countryside could be used for housing purposes. However, in my opinion, these areas are a great source of agriculture and trees needing protection and care.
Demand for new
houses
has
significantly
increased in
many
areas
. This has
started
a new debate since
countryside
might be the
only
place which has
enough
land
available
to build these homes. While
some
people
believe that protecting the existing
countryside
is essential
rather
than using it to construct new buildings, others might be against this notion. In my opinion, the argument regarding the protection of rural
land
is completely valid as building
house
there will lead to loss of
agricultural
land
and trees.
Construction of
houses
in the
countryside
will
reduce
available
agricultural
land
.
Even though
there is
still
plenty
of
land
available
for growing fruits and vegetables at the moment, this might be not the case if these
areas
are not protected. According to a recent study published online, a total 10 percent
agricultural
land
across the world has
severely
been
affected
by the urbanization factor in the last five years, which has made it harder for
many
countries to
meet
rising demands of fresh products they produce.
Therefore
, in order to save the
available
agricultural
land
, building homes in the
countryside
should
be discouraged
.
Moreover
, utilizing
countryside
space for living purposes can result in the loss of
trees
. In order to build
houses
in rural
areas
, most of the
trees
will need to
be cleared
; which can be
very
harmful for the environment.
For instance
, in a similar project undertaken by Pakistani authorities recently in order to provide public housing, almost sixteen thousand
trees
were removed
. As it is a
widely
known fact that
tree
removal
directly
affect our environment causing global warming,
countryside
construction should not be
allowed
in any case.
In conclusion
,
many
people
believe that the
land
available
in the
countryside
could be
used
for housing purposes.
However
, in my opinion, these
areas
are a great source of agriculture and
trees
needing protection and care.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes