Today poverty is still on full display anywhere in the world, even from the sparkling and vibrant streets of Los Angeles, or to the less glamorous district of Mumbai city. In the fight against poverty, help is at hand. However, a bone of contention remains whether people should directly support the underprivileged or give their donations to charities. This essay will look at this issue from both perspectives.
There are clearly justifications for why some funders would rather help the poor by themselves. First of all, help is given instantly as there is no paperwork, no collection, no delivery involved. It would also mean that no money is lost into the pockets of corrupt government officials. Second of all, it has been found that a considerable number of recipients of aid programs spend money on children’s education or healthcare, rather than alcohol or cigarettes. Therefore, development can be easily promoted.
However, the idea of giving cash directly to the poor is also treated with skepticism by many people who otherwise suggest that money or any other type of donation should be given to charity organisations. Their main argument is that for the people whose lives have always been devoid of material possessions or money, knowing how to manage the financial aids is out of the question. There are many cases that poor people use the money to start businesses; however, bankruptcy is imminent due to their lack of knowledge regarding financial management. For this reason, charities, which can distribute the funds in a more effective way, prove their prominent roles in improving living standards of the impoverished.
To conclude, I am inclined to think that giving money to charities is a better way to end poverty as it deals with deeper causes of the issue in the long run.
Today
poverty is
still
on full display anywhere in the world, even from the sparkling and vibrant streets of Los Angeles, or to the less glamorous district of Mumbai city. In the fight against poverty,
help
is at hand.
However
, a bone of contention remains whether
people
should
directly
support the underprivileged or give their donations to
charities
. This essay will look at this issue from both perspectives.
There are
clearly
justifications for why
some
funders would
rather
help
the poor by themselves.
First of all
,
help
is
given
instantly
as there is no paperwork, no collection, no delivery involved. It would
also
mean that no
money
is lost
into the pockets of corrupt
government
officials. Second of all, it has
been found
that a considerable number of recipients of aid programs spend
money
on children’s education or healthcare,
rather
than alcohol or cigarettes.
Therefore
, development can be
easily
promoted.
However
, the
idea
of giving cash
directly
to the poor is
also
treated with skepticism by
many
people
who
otherwise
suggest that
money
or any other type of donation should be
given
to
charity
organisations
. Their main argument is that for the
people
whose
lives
have always been devoid of material possessions or
money
, knowing how to manage the financial aids is out of the question. There are
many
cases that poor
people
use
the
money
to
start
businesses;
however
, bankruptcy is imminent due to their lack of knowledge regarding financial management.
For this reason
,
charities
, which can distribute the funds in a more effective way, prove their prominent roles in improving living standards of the impoverished.
To conclude
, I
am inclined
to
think
that giving
money
to
charities
is a better way to
end
poverty as it deals with deeper causes of the issue in the long run.