Some people opine that the use of cell phones in public places such as libraries, shops and public vehicles should be prohibited as it causes great annoyance to other people. Personally, I disagree with this point of view as I believe that with proper use, mobiles are still helpful.
On the one hand, it is true that mobile phones can be intrusive in public areas. For example, in places like libraries, where people are supposed to keep silent and concentrate on their books or reading materials, a mobile ringtone or a phone conversation can totally divert their attention, thereby disrupting the ideal work environment. Besides, mobile phones can be used to take photos of other people without their permission. On public means of transport like a bus, for instance, one can easily snap a photo of others without them even knowing. This not only invades their personal privacy but can also lead to potential risks, such as someone’s pictures being sold for commercial purposes or even other negative intentions.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned disadvantages, mobile phones are useful in a number of ways. First and foremost, these devices are not necessarily synonymous with irritation since they can easily be turned into silent or vibrate mode. Furthermore, they are a real help in many adverse circumstances in public places. In case of emergencies, for example a road accident, residents will have certain difficulties calling for the ambulance without phones. Additionally, when connected to the Internet via WiFi or 3G, these technological gadgets are a cheap source of entertainment on the move, comforting people on tedious journeys or in anxious situations. Therefore, a ban on mobile phones will deprive people of the undeniable benefits these devices provide. In conclusion, although mobile phones may cause disturbance for the public, I maintain that they are advantageous if used properly.
Some
people
opine that the
use
of cell
phones
in
public
places such as libraries, shops and
public
vehicles should
be prohibited
as it causes great annoyance to
other
people
.
Personally
, I disagree with this point of view as I believe that with proper
use
, mobiles are
still
helpful.
On the one hand, it is true that mobile
phones
can be intrusive in
public
areas.
For example
, in places like libraries, where
people
are supposed
to
keep
silent and concentrate on their books or reading materials, a mobile ringtone or a
phone
conversation can
totally
divert their attention, thereby disrupting the ideal work environment.
Besides
, mobile
phones
can be
used
to take photos of
other
people
without their permission. On
public
means of transport like a bus,
for instance
, one can
easily
snap a photo of others without them even knowing. This not
only
invades their personal privacy
but
can
also
lead to potential
risks
, such as someone’s pictures
being sold
for commercial purposes or even
other
negative
intentions.
On the
other
hand, despite the aforementioned disadvantages, mobile
phones
are useful in a number of ways.
First
and foremost, these devices are not
necessarily
synonymous with irritation since they can
easily
be turned
into silent or vibrate mode.
Furthermore
, they are a real
help
in
many
adverse circumstances in
public
places. In case of emergencies,
for example
a road accident, residents will have certain difficulties calling for the ambulance without
phones
.
Additionally
, when connected to the Internet via
WiFi
or 3G, these technological gadgets are a
cheap
source of entertainment on the
move
, comforting
people
on tedious journeys or in anxious situations.
Therefore
, a ban on mobile
phones
will deprive
people
of the undeniable benefits these devices provide.
In conclusion
, although mobile
phones
may cause disturbance for the
public
, I maintain that they are advantageous if
used
properly
.