In this contemporary era offence is rising at an alarming rate; therefore, some proponents opine that giving prison sentence to the criminals is one of the best ways to mitigate it however opponents reckon that it can be reduced by choosing other effective method thus this dissertation will shed light on both aspects in forthcoming paragraphs before reaching at particular conclusion.
To navigate by, one of the principle reasons behind former view is that if such punishment is given to offenders, it set an example for others because due to the fear of prison sentence, other individuals may not commit crime owing to which crime rate may decrease. To cite an example, in Russia, the year 2017, it was observed by authorities that due to having prison sentence more than half crime rate was declined. Another reason to consider is that those criminals who are sent in prison, may not commit crime again after releasing from such punishment.
On the flip side, there are plethora of reasons that why other steps are more effective to mitigate crime rate. First and predominant is providing accurate education to the people due the fact that most of the crime are done by those individuals who do not have proper knowledge about the drawbacks of doing illegal activities therefore if proper education is giver to them, this problem may reduce. To exemplify, in recent three year, Europe found that about 70%of wrongdoers did not have accurate education.
To conclude, although giving prison sentence helps to diminish the felony, in my perspective other methods are more empathetic for mitigating this problem because by having accurate knowledge about the consequences of doing such work, people may stay away from illegal activities
In this contemporary era
offence
is rising at an alarming
rate
;
therefore
,
some
proponents opine that giving
prison
sentence
to the criminals is one of the best ways to mitigate it
however
opponents reckon that it can be
reduced
by choosing
other
effective method
thus
this dissertation will shed light on both aspects in forthcoming paragraphs
before
reaching at particular conclusion.
To navigate by, one of the
principle
reasons behind former view is that if such punishment is
given
to offenders, it set an example for others
because
due to the fear of
prison
sentence
,
other
individuals may not commit
crime
owing to which
crime
rate
may decrease. To cite an example, in Russia, the year 2017, it
was observed
by authorities that due to having
prison
sentence
more than half
crime
rate
was declined
. Another reason to consider is that those criminals who are
sent
in
prison
, may not commit
crime
again after releasing from such punishment.
On the flip side, there are plethora of reasons that why
other
steps are more effective to mitigate
crime
rate
.
First
and predominant is providing accurate education to the
people
due the fact that most of the
crime
are done
by those individuals who do not have proper knowledge about the drawbacks of doing illegal activities
therefore
if proper education is giver to them, this problem may
reduce
. To exemplify, in recent three year, Europe found that about 70%of wrongdoers did not have accurate education.
To conclude
, although giving
prison
sentence
helps
to diminish the felony, in my perspective
other
methods are more empathetic for mitigating this problem
because
by having accurate knowledge about the consequences of doing such work,
people
may stay away from illegal activities