It is undoubtedly a matter of fact that social media has larger impact on individual's life rather than leader. I believe both the things have an equal impact over Public. I will elucidate several dimensions of all the aspects of this practice in this essay. In the modern era, people are spending more time with phones and TV as they think they give reliable information rather than leaders. In other words, now individuals become more aware about society issues. They think they should rely on social media to check anything about nations development rather than politicians. People think politicians always give false information about countries progress to make their good image. All this lead to decline the political influence on the individuals. For example a recent survey by a news publisher reveals the things that most of the politicians say in their speeches are far away from the reality. However, flip side of this issue is accountable as well. In most areas of the world people blindly trust leaders. This is to say, many interviews are given by distinct people on internet and television to stop them to blindly follow politicians. While it has no impact on them. They just waste their time on leaders ralleys and on listening their false speeches. Individuals think leaders are their role models and society's servant. People don't understand they do such things only to get votes. politicians real motive is to earn money rather than nations service. Consequently it shows that leaders have much influence on public rather than social media. In conclusion, although research shows social media have much impact on public yet leader also have equal influence on them
It is
undoubtedly
a matter of fact that
social
media
has larger
impact
on individual's life
rather
than
leader
. I believe both the things have an equal
impact
over Public. I will elucidate several dimensions of all the aspects of this practice in this essay. In the modern era,
people
are spending more time with phones and TV as they
think
they give reliable information
rather
than
leaders
.
In other words
,
now
individuals become more aware about society issues. They
think
they should rely on
social
media
to
check
anything about nations development
rather
than
politicians
.
People
think
politicians
always give false information about countries progress to
make
their
good
image. All this lead to decline the political influence on the individuals.
For example
a recent survey by a news publisher reveals the things that most of the
politicians
say in their speeches are far away from the reality.
However
, flip side of this issue is accountable
as well
. In most areas of the world
people
blindly
trust
leaders
. This is to say,
many
interviews are
given
by distinct
people
on internet and television to
stop
them to
blindly
follow
politicians
.
While
it has no
impact
on them. They
just
waste their time on
leaders
ralleys
and on listening their false speeches. Individuals
think
leaders
are their role models and society's servant.
People
don't understand they do such things
only
to
get
votes.
politicians
real motive is to earn money
rather
than nations service.
Consequently
it
shows
that
leaders
have much influence on public
rather
than
social
media
.
In conclusion
, although research
shows
social
media
have much
impact
on public
yet
leader
also
have equal influence on
them