There are two different opinions about government's regulation to construction, particularly design of buildings in major cities. Some people support this regulation, while others think that design should be defined by companies, which provide funding. This essay will analyze both points of view and provide evidence that government should control design of new buildings.
Government regulation of design in big cities is the common practice around the world. It helps to keep architectural balance with the existing and future buildings, usually it should comply to general plane of city, which plans future image of city for years ahead. Separate project initiators don't have a entire vision to a city. Furthermore, this control helps to maintain safety issues (particularly in seismic zones, or close to oceans), because some of it can be prevented on design phase, before start of construction.
However, some people think that design of a building should be free and defined by initiators of projects, who finance it. Their main point is that government regulation affects design to negative side. Additional interventions can change project significantly, and it takes time, therefore cost of construction can increase. For example, in Kazakhstan government regulation in this sphere had cause of corruption, when company owners pay illegal money to government employees to support projects.
In my opinion, government should regulate this sphere. Without its control it is harder to make big cities comfortable and convenient, usually local governments have a vision of city's development for future, and this regulation helps to reject projects that do not comply with city's architecture.
There are two
different
opinions about
government
's
regulation
to construction,
particularly
design
of buildings in major
cities
.
Some
people
support this
regulation
, while others
think
that
design
should
be defined
by
companies
, which provide funding. This essay will analyze both points of view and provide evidence that
government
should control
design
of new buildings.
Government
regulation
of
design
in
big
cities
is the common practice around the world. It
helps
to
keep
architectural balance with the existing and future buildings,
usually
it should comply to general
plane
of city, which plans future image of city for years ahead. Separate
project
initiators don't have
a
entire vision to a city.
Furthermore
, this control
helps
to maintain safety issues (
particularly
in seismic zones, or close to oceans),
because
some
of it can be
prevented
on
design
phase,
before
start
of construction.
However
,
some
people
think
that
design
of a building should be free and defined by initiators of
projects
, who finance it. Their main point is that
government
regulation
affects
design
to
negative
side. Additional interventions can
change
project
significantly
, and it takes time,
therefore
cost of construction can increase.
For example
, in Kazakhstan
government
regulation
in this sphere had cause of corruption, when
company
owners pay illegal money to
government
employees to support projects.
In my opinion,
government
should regulate this sphere. Without its control it is harder to
make
big
cities
comfortable and convenient,
usually
local
governments
have a vision of city's development for future, and this
regulation
helps
to reject
projects
that do not comply with city's architecture.