Nowadays, crime has dramatically increased and has been a challenging issue when compared to past. The people have different views about whether the evidence of crime need photos or videos enough or not. In this essay i will examine both views and I support latter statement in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, people who support with photos and videos, the proof of crime is enough for finding the person who attended the illegal act. For example, recently criminal attack that was happend in kuwait and it has proved immediately with the help of cctv camera that provides accurate optical evidence of this crime. Thus, some illegal activity has been finding easily in the way of analyzing of photos and videos in presence of court.
On the other hand, it is certainly true that some important and planed murder case or illegal act was not proved with the support of optical proofs. such cases need more evidences other than photos and videos which helps to ameliorate the true statement of person who attended the crime. For example, financial or cyber crime activity needs more critical evidence to prove the actual reason to find out what happend at a time of crime. so i support this latter statement that photos and videos are not enough for getting the correct evidence in some important crime that was committed.
To put it in a nutshell, it is true that in the modern life, crime has been increased more than in the past. Although the photos and videos helps to find the actual evidence, but they are not enough to get actual data about the case, like financial case or cyber crime.
Nowadays,
crime
has
dramatically
increased and has been a challenging issue when compared to past. The
people
have
different
views about whether the
evidence
of
crime
need
photos
or
videos
enough
or not. In this essay
i
will examine both views and I
support
latter statement in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand,
people
who
support
with
photos
and
videos
, the proof of
crime
is
enough
for finding the person who attended the illegal act.
For example
, recently criminal attack that was
happend
in
kuwait
and it has proved immediately with the
help
of
cctv
camera that provides accurate optical
evidence
of this
crime
.
Thus
,
some
illegal activity has been finding
easily
in the way of analyzing of
photos
and
videos
in presence of court.
On the other hand
, it is
certainly
true that
some
important
and planed murder case or illegal act was not proved with the
support
of optical proofs.
such
cases need more
evidences
other than
photos
and
videos
which
helps
to ameliorate the true statement of person who attended the
crime
.
For example
, financial or cyber
crime
activity needs more critical
evidence
to prove the actual reason to find out what
happend
at a time of
crime
.
so
i
support
this latter statement that
photos
and
videos
are not
enough
for getting the correct
evidence
in
some
important
crime
that
was committed
.
To put it in a nutshell, it is true that in the modern life,
crime
has
been increased
more than in the past. Although the
photos
and
videos
helps
to find the actual
evidence
,
but
they are not
enough
to
get
actual data about the case, like financial case or cyber
crime
.