Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity. Discuss both views and state vour own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

When a new drug or surgical technique is developed, society and medical experts consider it unethical to use that drug or technique first in human beings because of the possibility that it would cause harm rather than good. While many people believe that animal experimentations are to ensure the effectiveness of new treatments and some others opine that this act is inhuman and immoral. In this essay, I am going to examine both points of view and then give my own perspective on the matter. To begin with, the main reason why some people value animal experimentations to conduct medical research is because animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. It is a fact that nearly every medical breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted directly from research using animals. For example, experiments in which dogs had their pancreas removed led to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the lives of diabetic patients. Furthermore, it is impossible to release new drugs to the market before proving it has not harm to humans. In addition, many patients could lose their lives because of the wrong dosage prescribed by doctors which has not been tested before. However, many people argue that testing on animals is immoral and unacceptable. The lives of all creatures should be respected and we, humans, have no right to suffer animals for our own benefits. Government should invest in developing alternative methods that can replace using animal experimentations when doing medical research. For instance, a software program can be developed to model a human immune system and new drugs can be tested on the software rather than animals. In this way, no animals will suffer from pain and the society can still benefit from medical development. In conclusion, although it is undoubtedly true that animal testing has helped scientist in drug developments and medical discoveries. I tend to believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the sufferings caused to animals and we should use alternative methods when doing medical research that do not involve living animals.
When a
new
drug
or surgical technique
is developed
, society and
medical
experts consider it unethical to
use
that
drug
or technique
first
in
human
beings
because
of the possibility that it would cause harm
rather
than
good
. While
many
people
believe that
animal
experimentations
are to ensure the effectiveness of
new
treatments and
some
others opine that this act is inhuman and immoral. In this essay, I am going to examine both points of view and then give my
own
perspective on the matter.

To
begin
with, the main reason why
some
people
value
animal
experimentations
to conduct
medical
research
is
because
animal
testing has contributed to
many
life-saving cures and treatments. It is a fact that
nearly
every
medical
breakthrough in the last 100 years has resulted
directly
from
research
using
animals
.
For example
, experiments in which dogs had their pancreas removed led to the discovery of insulin, critical to saving the
lives
of diabetic patients.
Furthermore
, it is impossible to release
new
drugs
to the market
before
proving it has not
harm
to
humans
.
In addition
,
many
patients could lose their
lives
because
of the
wrong
dosage prescribed by doctors which has not been
tested
before
.

However
,
many
people
argue that testing on
animals
is immoral and unacceptable. The
lives
of all creatures should
be respected
and we,
humans
, have no right to suffer
animals
for our
own
benefits.
Government
should invest in developing alternative methods that can replace using
animal
experimentations
when doing
medical
research
.
For instance
, a software program can
be developed
to model a
human
immune system and
new
drugs
can be
tested
on the software
rather
than
animals
. In this way, no
animals
will suffer from pain and the society can
still
benefit from
medical
development.

In conclusion
, although it is
undoubtedly
true that
animal
testing has
helped
scientist in
drug
developments and
medical
discoveries. I tend to believe that the benefits to
humans
do not justify the sufferings caused to
animals and
we should
use
alternative methods when doing
medical
research
that do not involve living
animals
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that using animals to test the safety of human medicines is cruel and unwarranted, whereas others feel it is a medical necessity.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
345 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts