Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Over a decade, the usage of fossil resource as a major of fuel in machinery things, especially vehicles, becomes a major of debate. The reason behind this controversy is because of the impact that it inflicts in the increasing number of traffic together with the pollution produces by them. Regarding that matter, many people think that increasing the petrol price will solve those problems, but in my opinion, I do not think it works. Therefore, in this essay, I would like to explain my belief and the effective ways to encounter those issues as well as providing a plausible conclusion. To begin with, as we have known, the majority of human activities involving the movement that accommodates by machines. In order to run those machines, we use oil or gasoline, but now these resources have been depleted into some amount that is not sufficient for all of us. Also, as an effect of using those fuels for over a half of century, the pollution accumulates at a tremendous level that will poison human being. However, we can not deny that the rising petrol price will lower traffic and pollution, but in a long-term period, it will impact the global economy. Why did I say that? It simply because most of the industries have used vehicles to ship their goods. If the cost of petrol rises, their budgets will spend mostly into it. Followed by the surge of some commodities, including the raw material that they need. Thus, the cost of their goods will increase, while the major of their consumers can not afford it. In the end, there are only a few transactions that occur because of the reduction in purchasing power which leads to a global detrimental economy. Moreover, in response to the issues, there are 2 choices to solve them. In the case of lowering pollution, it is better to adopt some renewable resources, such as wind or solar energy, as the major fuel for vehicles. Secondly, in terms of encountering a traffic problem, we can still use public transportation in which the government needs to control the services and the quality to make sure the passengers feel comfortable. Because when people feel comfortable with public transportation, they will use it more frequently and leave their opinion to buy or use private cars. Finally, all problems may solve without adding another trouble. In a nutshell, increasing oil and gasoline cost will not solve the problems, it just adds another problem like lowering the purchasing power that has an impact on the global economy. Hence, it is better to adopt some alternatives resource to accommodate transport together with maintaining public transportation services and quality. So, in my honest opinion, I totally disagree with that notion.

Over a decade, the usage of fossil You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabilitytalentwealthmeanssupportsystem
resource
 as a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdominantlarge-scalebigprimarylargesizable
major
 of fuel in machinery things, especially
 vehicles, becomes a You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdominantlarge-scalebigprimarylargesizable
major
 of debate. The reason behind this controversy is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the impact that it inflicts in the increasing number of traffic together with the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 produces by them. Regarding that matter, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 that increasing the petrol price will You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 in my opinion, I do not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 it works. Therefore
, in this essay, I would like to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interpret
explain
 my belief and the effective ways to encounter those issues as well
 as providing a plausible conclusion.

To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :initiatecommence
begin
 with, as we have known, the majority of human activities involving the movement that accommodates by machines. In order to run those machines, we This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 oil or gasoline, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
 these resources have been depleted
 into This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 amount that is
 not sufficient for all of us. Also
, as an effect of using those fuels for over a half of century, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
 accumulates at a tremendous level that will poison human being. However
, we can not deny that the rising petrol price will lower traffic and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 in a long-term period, it will impact the global economy. Why did I say that? It simply
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 most of the industries have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 vehicles to ship their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
. If the cost of petrol rises, their budgets will spend mostly
 into it. Followed by the surge of This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 commodities, including the raw material that they need. Thus
, the cost of their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 will increase, while the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdominantlarge-scalebigprimarylargesizable
major
 of their consumers can not afford it. In the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
, there are This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 a few transactions that occur This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the reduction in purchasing power which leads to a global detrimental economy.

Moreover
, in response to the issues, there are 2 choices to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 them. In the case of lowering You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabuseinfectioncorruptiondeterioration
pollution
, it is better to adopt This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 renewable resources, such as wind or solar energy, as the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdominantlarge-scalebigprimarylargesizable
major
 fuel for vehicles. Secondly
, in terms of encountering a traffic You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
, we can still
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 public transportation in which the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritypublic authority
government
 needs to control the services and the quality to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 sure the passengers feel comfortable. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
 when This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 feel comfortable with public transportation, they will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 it more frequently
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :depart
leave
 their opinion to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :purchase
buy
 or This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 private cars. Finally
, all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
 may You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 without adding another trouble.

In a nutshell, increasing oil and gasoline cost will not You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdodeterminefixclear upexplainclarify
solve
 the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problems
, it This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accrues
adds
 another You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcomplicationdilemmaquestionobstacletroubledispute
problem
 like lowering the purchasing power that has an impact on the global economy. Hence
, it is better to adopt This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 alternatives You use this word too often, consider replacing it withabilitytalentwealthmeanssupportsystem
resource
 to accommodate transport together with maintaining public transportation services and quality. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, in my honest opinion, I totally
 disagree with that notion. 