Punishing the offenders is very crucial to maintain law and order in the society. Several Individuals assert that it would be better to have a fixed punishment system for all kinds of crimes. However, others believe that degree of offence should be taken into consideration before giving any ruthlessness punishment. This essay will discuss both sides, but I am personally inclined to the latter view.
There are a plethora of contributing factors that support a fixed punishment system. First and Foremost, the ruthlessness of punishment keeps away everyone from the criminal activities. Thus it ensures peace and harmony in the society. For example, Arabic country recorded less rate of crime owing to their harsh punishment such as death and lifetime imprisonment in each crime. Secondly, it also saves time and money of judiciary and public as well. This time can be utilized for curbing other issues. For instance, a number of innocents have to spend some time in imprisonment and criminals moves freely due to delay in decision.
On the other hand, a number of people believe that degree of offence should be considered before penalizing criminals. The main aim of the judicial system is to penalize the offenders not the innocents. Many a times, the innocent person has to bear the cost of crime done by others. Sometimes they feel that there should be some flexibility in law for them to prove their innocence. A Pick pocketer cannot be sentenced to death for this crime. This offence cannot be compare with the assassination. Assassination and burglary are more heinous crime under which degree of punishment should be more as compared to other offences.
To recapitulate, I would like to reiterate that although a fixed punishment assist in maintaining law in the community, but its negative consequences could not be overlooked. So, it would be better to think about the level and type of crime.
Punishing the offenders is
very
crucial to maintain law and order in the society. Several Individuals assert that it would be better to have a
fixed
punishment
system for all kinds of
crimes
.
However
, others believe that degree of
offence
should
be taken
into consideration
before
giving any ruthlessness
punishment
. This essay will discuss both sides,
but
I am
personally
inclined to the latter view.
There are a plethora of contributing factors that support a
fixed
punishment
system.
First
and Foremost, the ruthlessness of
punishment
keeps
away everyone from the criminal activities.
Thus
it ensures peace and harmony in the society.
For example
, Arabic country recorded less rate of
crime
owing to their harsh
punishment
such as death and lifetime imprisonment in each
crime
.
Secondly
, it
also
saves
time
and money of judiciary and public
as well
. This
time
can
be utilized
for curbing
other
issues.
For instance
, a number of innocents
have to
spend
some
time
in imprisonment and criminals
moves
freely
due to delay in decision.
On the
other
hand, a number of
people
believe that degree of
offence
should
be considered
before
penalizing criminals. The main aim of the judicial system is to penalize the offenders not the innocents.
Many
a
times
, the innocent person
has to
bear the cost of
crime
done by others.
Sometimes
they feel that there should be
some
flexibility in law for them to prove their innocence. A Pick
pocketer
cannot
be sentenced
to death for this
crime
. This
offence
cannot be
compare
with the assassination. Assassination and burglary are more heinous
crime
under which degree of
punishment
should be more
as
compared to
other
offences
.
To recapitulate, I would like to reiterate that although a
fixed
punishment
assist in maintaining law in the community,
but
its
negative
consequences could not
be overlooked
.
So
, it would be better to
think
about the level and type of
crime
.