A few group accept that there ought to fixed disciplines for each type of offence, whereas, other people claim that the situations of an offence, and the inspiration of carrying out it, have to consistently be considered when settling on discipline. This essay will discuss both views in detail.
On the one hand, nowadays, graph of wrongdoing is soaring on the globe, so it is mandatory to punished criminals. Number of people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of wrongdoing. For example, if one did the murder with intension of getting money from individual, or getting revenge of their personal matters then considering the motivation behind doing this, one can give punishment such as send murderer behind the rods of jail, or hanging. In this condition it is fair to have fixed set of rules and regulation of punishment. Although, it is also beneficial for any country to have fixed sets of punishments for some kind of crime such as for doing rape, any sexual harassment, blackmailing, breaches the constitutional rules, terrorism, smuggling etc.
On the other hand, what happen if individual kill human accidently? Considering one scenario in which some antisocial gang doing some illegal activities to one person such as hitting them with hockey, robbing them in the edge of knives, consequently, during self-defence person accidently may kill criminal or injured them badly. In this case logically person is innocent, so that, in this situation court should not give the punishment without taking note about condition. Subsequently, from this view it is not right to have fixed punishments for each crime.
In conclusion, and in my opinion, I think it is better to have fixed punishments for specifics types of crime but not for all. In addition, court ought to consider every aspects of doing crime such as intension, motivation and many more traits.
A
few group
accept that there ought to
fixed
disciplines for each type of
offence
, whereas, other
people
claim that the situations of an
offence
, and the inspiration of carrying out it,
have to
consistently
be considered
when settling on discipline. This essay will discuss both views in detail.
On the one hand, nowadays, graph of wrongdoing is soaring on the globe,
so
it is mandatory to punished criminals. Number of
people
believe that there should be
fixed
punishments
for each type of wrongdoing.
For example
, if one did the murder with
intension
of getting money from individual, or getting revenge of their personal matters then considering the motivation behind
doing
this, one can give
punishment
such as
send
murderer behind the rods of jail, or hanging. In this condition it is
fair
to have
fixed
set of
rules
and regulation of
punishment
. Although, it is
also
beneficial for any country to have
fixed
sets of
punishments
for
some
kind of crime such as for
doing
rape, any sexual harassment, blackmailing, breaches the constitutional
rules
, terrorism, smuggling etc.
On the other hand
, what happen if individual kill human
accidently
? Considering one scenario in which
some
antisocial gang
doing
some
illegal activities to one person such as hitting them with hockey, robbing them in the edge of knives,
consequently
, during
self-defence
person
accidently
may kill criminal or injured them
badly
.
In this case
logically
person is innocent,
so
that, in this situation court should not give the
punishment
without taking note about condition.
Subsequently
, from this view it is not right to have
fixed
punishments
for each crime.
In conclusion
, and in my opinion, I
think
it is better to have
fixed
punishments
for specifics types of crime
but
not for all.
In addition
, court ought to consider every
aspects
of
doing
crime such as
intension
, motivation and
many
more traits.