Writing task 2
It is generally reckoned by the individuals that the college aspirants should learn according to their interest, but other ponder that the science and technology courses must be taken by the pupils. According to my prospective, if the learners are getting subject as their affinity, they study with full concentration; if the courses are restrict on them then, they are not get the fruitful result.
There are certain people ponder that the tertary learners must learn whatever their interest in. I perceive that this will incline their concentration in studies. Moreover, if the pupils can choose their courses according to their interest; this will boost their result; the aspirants can show their own curiosity and they are not only restricted to science and technology. The learners can also get the opportunity to boost their career in arts and sports. Michel teacher of RV college research that the children who choose career as per their aspirations; they score better and passionate about their career. To exemplify, Sania Nehwal make her career in sports and become renowned sports person in badminton game this is possible because she choose her subject own.
There are few people believe that there must be restriction on certain subjects such as science and technology. I think that, if learners have not been getting the freedom of choosing subjects then, it is not worthwhile for them but, they will get the stable job opportunities that they will not get in arts and music. The science and technology are theoretical subject; these subject increase their cognitive power. For instance, 50% of the Indian aspirants get the better employment because they re permitted to some important subjects. Hence, the idea of restricting science and technology is valid.
In conclusion, I believe that the liberty has been giving to the learners so that, they can study different subjects of their own choice.
Writing task 2
It is
generally
reckoned by the individuals that the college aspirants should learn according to their interest,
but
other ponder that the
science
and
technology
courses
must
be taken
by the pupils. According to my prospective, if the
learners
are getting
subject
as their affinity, they study with full concentration; if the courses are
restrict
on them then, they are not
get
the fruitful result.
There are certain
people
ponder that the
tertary
learners
must
learn whatever their interest in. I perceive that this will incline their concentration in studies.
Moreover
, if the pupils can choose their courses according to their interest; this will boost their result; the aspirants can
show
their
own
curiosity and
they are not
only
restricted to
science
and
technology
. The
learners
can
also
get
the opportunity to boost their
career
in arts and sports. Michel teacher of RV college research that the children who choose
career
as per their aspirations; they score better and passionate about their
career
. To exemplify,
Sania
Nehwal
make
her
career
in sports and become renowned sports person in badminton game this is possible
because
she
choose
her
subject
own
.
There are few
people
believe that there
must
be restriction on certain
subjects
such as
science
and
technology
. I
think
that, if
learners
have not been getting the freedom of choosing
subjects
then, it is not worthwhile for them
but
, they will
get
the stable job opportunities that they will not
get
in arts and music. The
science
and
technology
are theoretical
subject
; these
subject
increase their cognitive power.
For instance
, 50% of the Indian aspirants
get
the better employment
because
they re permitted to
some
important
subjects
.
Hence
, the
idea
of restricting
science
and
technology
is valid.
In conclusion
, I believe that the liberty has been giving to the
learners
so
that, they can study
different
subjects
of their
own
choice.