Censorship is widely practiced all over the world, as it is supposed to protect people against the harm caused by the violent and pornographic scenes broadcast on TV; however, in my opinion probably the most obvious example of intolerance in our society today is the existence of censorship.
First, I have yet to encounter a valid argument for any form of censorship. Such arguments as are presented invariably take the form of concern for the well-being of others, children frequently being the alleged victims quoted. The arguments are specious and shallow and constitute nothing more than the imposition of one group’s morality on another.
Furthermore, as it stands, the current position is farcical. A small group of officials, comprising customs clerks, policemen and arbitrarily-appointed members of various tribunals, are, to take one example, apparently deemed by law to be invulnerable to those supposedly corrupting influences of pornography and violence. However, should these people retire or change their employment, they suddenly join the masses becoming corruptible like the rest of us and must now be protected
However, I much acknowledge that the violence and pornography shown on TV may inflict some harm on the youth and teenagers in our society. It may increase the rate of sex crime or violence in our community. I believe the harmful effects of these scenes can never be denied.
In conclusion, censorship is an all or nothing situation and even if proof can be made of harm to some through the absence of censorship, it is a price well worth paying to ensure an open society in which each of us determines our own behaviour.
Censorship
is
widely
practiced all over the world, as it
is supposed
to protect
people
against the harm caused by the violent and pornographic scenes broadcast on TV;
however
, in my opinion
probably
the most obvious example of intolerance in our society
today
is the existence of censorship.
First
, I have
yet
to encounter a valid argument for any form of
censorship
. Such arguments as
are presented
invariably
take the form of concern for the well-being of others, children
frequently
being the alleged victims quoted. The arguments are specious and shallow and constitute nothing more than the imposition of one group’s morality on another.
Furthermore
, as it stands, the
current
position is farcical. A
small
group of officials, comprising customs clerks, policemen and
arbitrarily
-appointed members of various tribunals, are, to take one example,
apparently
deemed by law to be invulnerable to those
supposedly
corrupting influences of pornography and violence.
However
, should these
people
retire or
change
their employment, they
suddenly
join
the masses becoming corruptible like the rest of us and
must
now
be protected
However
, I much acknowledge that the violence and pornography shown on TV may inflict
some
harm on the youth and
teenagers
in our society. It may increase the rate of sex crime or violence in our community. I believe the harmful effects of these scenes can never
be denied
.
In conclusion
,
censorship
is an all or nothing situation and even if proof can
be made
of harm to
some
through the absence of
censorship
, it is a price well worth paying to ensure an open society in which each of us determines our
own
behaviour
.