The argument, over whether capital punishment aids in restricting the crime rate or not, have not been settled yet. I completely agree with this notion not only because it saves society from those offenders who have completed their sentences, and terminate convict’s network with the outer world, but also gives a moral lesson to others. This essay will explore how these factors justify the death sentence as a way to control crime.
Firstly, some offenders commits crimes after completing their sentences due to which the crime rate remains stagnant. This is to say, ex-convicts are unable to secure a better place in the society after leaving jail, and often get back to their criminal world because of the lack of effective rehabilitation system. If the death penalty were common, it would help to overcome the crime rate. Take an example of Abu Ramal, a Yemen rebel, who was the sole reason for igniting a civil war in the country after getting exonerated by the government. Thus, hanging to death is one a measure to control offences.
Secondly, terrorists have a strong communication network with their gang, even from behind the bars. As some corrupt officials allow incarcerated criminals to operate their network from jail. For example, in Afghanistan, the country head of Al-Qaida was involved in orchestrating many terrorist activities in Kabul from jail. Hence, sentencing these prisoners a capital punishment helps in breaking the connection between criminals which ultimately reduces the crime rate.
Finally, in order to curb the crime rate, capital punishment can be used as a tool to give a lesson to others to refrain themselves from such activities and abide by the law. Therefore, the fear of death in public is a must to control crime.
To sum up, people may vary in their opinions; however, I agree that the death penalty is fully justified in terms of decreasing the crime rate by giving a moral lesson to the public, control re-offending and breaking the criminal network.
The argument, over whether capital punishment aids in restricting the
crime
rate
or not, have not
been settled
yet
. I completely
agree
with this notion not
only
because
it saves society from those offenders who have completed their sentences, and terminate convict’s
network
with the outer world,
but
also
gives a moral lesson to others. This essay will explore how these factors justify the death sentence as a way to
control
crime.
Firstly
,
some
offenders commits
crimes
after completing their sentences due to which the
crime
rate
remains stagnant. This is to say, ex-convicts are unable to secure a better place in the society after leaving jail, and
often
get
back to their
criminal
world
because
of the lack of effective rehabilitation system. If the death penalty were common, it would
help
to overcome the
crime
rate
. Take an example of Abu
Ramal
, a Yemen rebel, who was the sole reason for igniting a civil war in the country after getting exonerated by the
government
.
Thus
, hanging to death is one a measure to
control
offences
.
Secondly
, terrorists have a strong communication
network
with their gang, even from behind the bars.
As
some
corrupt officials
allow
incarcerated
criminals
to operate their
network
from jail.
For example
, in Afghanistan, the country head of
Al-Qaida
was involved
in orchestrating
many
terrorist activities in Kabul from jail.
Hence
, sentencing these prisoners a capital punishment
helps
in breaking the
connection between
criminals
which
ultimately
reduces
the
crime
rate.
Finally
, in order to curb the
crime
rate
, capital punishment can be
used
as a tool to give a lesson to others to refrain themselves from such activities and abide by the law.
Therefore
, the fear of death in public is a
must to
control
crime.
To sum up,
people
may vary in their opinions;
however
, I
agree
that the death penalty is
fully
justified in terms of decreasing the
crime
rate
by giving a moral lesson to the public,
control
re-offending and breaking the
criminal
network
.