Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centres is for privately owned vehicles to be banned, others however think this is not a realistic solution. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centres is for privately owned vehicles to be banned, others however think this is not a realistic solution. nRPrE
The debate on whether or not personal vehicles should be banned in urban areas has led to polarised views. Although some people belive that prohibiting private vehicles is the most suitable method to tackle traffic congestion, others are of contrary opinion. In my opinion, I disagree with the view that personal cars should not be allowed in the city because there are insufficient public transports in urban areas On the one hand, some people, are of the opinion that in order to curb the enormous traffic in the cities, private vehicles should be prevented from moving on the roads because when they are banned, there will be fewer cars on the highways, thereby indirectly reducing traffic congestion. For instance, in USA, there are limited places where private cars are allowed to move. Their major means of transportation is the government owned electronic trains which helps to put a check on traffic. Nevertheless, despite the benefit, I completely disagree with this view because there are limited public transports. On the other hand, some people including myself believe that prohibiting private vehicles are impratical. This is because, there are limited vehicles for mass transit, that is to say, the cars available for public transport cannot keep pace with the increase in population of the city. For example, In 2010 when government restricted private vehicles in China, as a means of restricting traffic jam, there was no enough vehicle to transport people to there respective destinations, frequently they have to sit in a long traffic queues. From the aforementioned example, it is apparent that more investment need to be put into mass transport in order to alleviate traffic jams. In conclusion, a reasonable number of people are of the opinion that personal vehicles should not be allowed in city centre while others feel this is unrealistic. In my opinion, I totally disagree with the view that personal cars should be banned because there are insufficient public transport to covey people.
The debate on
Consider shortening this phrase to just "whether". It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
whether or not
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
should
be banned
in urban areas has led to
Possible spelling mistake. 'polarised' is British English.
polarised
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
views
. Although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
Possible spelling mistake found.
belive
that prohibiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
is the most suitable method to tackle
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion, others are of contrary
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
. In my
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
, I disagree with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
should not be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
in the city
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there are insufficient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transports
in urban
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
areas


On the one hand,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
, are of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
that in order to curb the enormous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cities
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevented
from moving on the roads
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
when they
are banned
, there will be fewer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
on the highways, thereby
indirectly
reducing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
congestion.
For instance
,
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the USA".
in USA
, there
are limited
places where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
. Their major means of transportation is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
owned
electronic trains which
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
helps
to put a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
on traffic.

Nevertheless
, despite the benefit, I completely disagree with this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there
are limited
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
transports.

On the other hand
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
including myself believe that prohibiting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
are
Possible spelling mistake found.
impratical
. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
, there
are limited
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
for mass transit,
that is
to say, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
available for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
cannot
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
pace with the increase in population of the city.
For example
, In 2010 when
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
restricted
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
in China, as a means of restricting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
jam, there was no
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicle
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to
Did you mean "their"?
there
respective destinations,
frequently
they
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
sit in a long
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
queues. From the aforementioned example, it is apparent that more investment need to
be put
into mass
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
in order to alleviate
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
traffic
jams.

In conclusion
, a reasonable number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
vehicles
should not be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
in city
Possible spelling mistake. 'centre' is British English.
centre
while others feel this is unrealistic. In my
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
opinion
, I
totally
disagree with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
personal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cars
should
be banned
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
there are insufficient
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
public
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
transport
to covey
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centres is for privately owned vehicles to be banned, others however think this is not a realistic solution.

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
327 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Some people believe that the best way to deal with heavy traffic in city centres is for privately owned vehicles to be banned, others however think this is not a realistic solution. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.