Some people claim that while teenagers are having free time, they should be required to perform unpaid community work. As a result, it can be advantages to their community and teenagers. In my perspective, I firmly agree with this argument as the community and teenagers earn various benefits such as more responsible and more workers.
The first and foremost reason is more responsible to the students. If they are requiring to do work instead of chilling, it makes them more mature and more precise time. For example, school of New Zealand has one program that makes many merits to its country, which is encouraging boarding teenagers to work in their free time. Thus, students in those schools are having ability to work when they are studying. Consequently, this program provides those students to be more understand what they should undertake and benefits to them. Then, the schools will have less negative actions from students like a country of New Zealand. Moreover, those schools will be more well-known to many people, and more parents would like to let their child study in those schools. The outcome will be growing more income in those institutions.
Another advantage is more employees. This has several profits to the community such as less works to perform in each person, and the community also does not have to pay for teenagers. Subsequently, their works will finish faster and more productivity. Additionally, the community will posses to pay less than before for all workers since they are having less works to perform.
Having carefully analyses both sides of argument, I completely agree with the foregoing statement because it has more advantages than demerits to the community. This means that I am supporting the statement of teenagers should be working for community without pay while they are having nothing to do.
Some
people
claim that while
teenagers
are
having
free time, they should
be required
to perform unpaid
community
work
.
As a result
, it can be advantages to their
community
and
teenagers
. In my perspective, I
firmly
agree
with this argument as the
community
and
teenagers
earn various benefits such as more responsible and more workers.
The
first
and foremost reason is more responsible to the
students
. If they are requiring
to do
work
instead
of chilling, it
makes
them more mature and more precise time.
For example
,
school
of New Zealand has one program that
makes
many
merits to its country, which is encouraging boarding
teenagers
to
work
in their free time.
Thus
,
students
in those
schools
are
having
ability to
work
when they are studying.
Consequently
, this program provides those
students
to be more understand what they should undertake and benefits to them. Then, the
schools
will have
less
negative
actions from
students
like a country of New Zealand.
Moreover
, those
schools
will be more well-known to
many
people
, and more parents would like to
let
their child study in those
schools
. The outcome will be growing more income in those institutions.
Another advantage is more employees. This has several profits to the
community
such as
less
works to perform in each person, and the
community
also
does not
have to
pay for
teenagers
.
Subsequently
, their works will finish faster and more productivity.
Additionally
, the
community
will posses to pay
less
than
before
for all workers since they are
having
less
works to perform.
Having
carefully
analyses both sides of argument, I completely
agree
with the foregoing statement
because
it has more advantages than demerits to the
community
. This means that I am supporting the statement of
teenagers
should be working for
community
without pay while they are
having
nothing to do.