It is true that some opine government ought to give the equal opportunity for every individual to be educated in universities free of charge regardless of their material status. Although it can seem fair to give such an opportunity to everyone, however I firmly believe it is impractical for a government to implement such a policy as it might have deleterious consequences, such as destruction of working balance in societies and negative effect on governments` finance.
On the one hand, should government give this chance for everyone, it will result in the destruction of social categories balance. That is, everybody who gets graduated from a posh university will definitely start to desire jobs of high positions in working companies. Furthermore, needless to say it will lead to the loss of blue-collar positions such as electricians and mechanics. Take Cambridge University graduates as an example who are mostly, 75% of them to be precise, hired by successful companies and organizations depending on the department they have studied, and the rest of them establish their own businesses.
On the other hand, the finance of the government will hugely be affected by paying the tuition fees for population. In addition, tuition fees for an individual cost around 15. 000 dollars per semester in an average university in the UK. If government finances the whole nation, the financial store of a government is surely to be weakened, which might consequently lead to the increase in taxes. As a result, people will blame the government for raised taxes and for the destroyed balance in their society.
In conclusion, while some people want to oblige the government to sponsor every citizen`s education in a country regardless of their financial background, I reckon that government must avoid implying such a policy as it will end up in the demolition of the balance in communities as well as the government`s material store will tremendously be damaged.
It is true that
some
opine
government
ought to give the equal opportunity for every individual to
be educated
in
universities
free of charge regardless of their material status. Although it can seem
fair
to give such an opportunity to everyone,
however
I
firmly
believe it is impractical for a
government
to implement such a policy as it might have deleterious consequences, such as destruction of working
balance
in societies and
negative
effect on
governments`
finance.
On the one hand, should
government
give this chance for everyone, it will result in the destruction of social categories
balance
.
That is
, everybody who
gets
graduated from a posh
university
will definitely
start
to desire jobs of high positions in working
companies
.
Furthermore
, needless to say it will lead to the loss of blue-collar positions such as electricians and mechanics. Take Cambridge
University
graduates as an example who are
mostly
, 75% of them to be precise, hired by successful
companies
and organizations depending on the department they have studied, and the rest of them establish their
own
businesses.
On the other hand
, the finance of the
government
will
hugely
be
affected
by paying the tuition fees for population.
In addition
, tuition fees for an individual cost around 15. 000 dollars per semester in an average
university
in the UK. If
government
finances the whole nation, the financial store of a
government
is
surely
to
be weakened
, which might
consequently
lead to the increase in taxes.
As a result
,
people
will blame the
government
for raised taxes and for the
destroyed
balance
in their society.
In conclusion
, while
some
people
want to oblige the
government
to sponsor every
citizen`s
education in a country regardless of their financial background, I reckon that
government
must
avoid implying such a policy as it will
end
up in the demolition of the
balance
in communities
as well
as the
government`s
material store will
tremendously
be damaged
.