21th century, the century of high technology has provided us information and a clearer view about the nature and environment that were corrupted and polluted in the last two centuries. Therefore in our century it has become a worldwide burden to improve our environment. Some people only rely on the government or the big companies to improve our environment. But I completely disagree with this idea. I believe that it’s a problem that bothers all humankind, so we have to deal with it internationally.
Governments can provide protection for key ecosystems like rivers to protect the water purity, or another example as protecting or growing more mangroves which absorbs large quantity of carbon and also absorbs excess from flood. Governments and big companies can promote and support green energy which provides our renewable energy. They can also accelerate improvement of environment by supporting small agricultural producers with the previous solutions altogether.
But as we can fathom and comprehend, these solutions can be very challenging without cooperation of individuals. We can reduce and recycle our wastes which includes chemicals, use energy more efficiently such as using bikes or public transportation instead of cars or motorcycles, flying less. Planting trees and preventing forests from loss can do one of the greatest help to improve environment, alongside with protecting its inhabitants within.
In conclusion, I disagree that improvisation of environment is only governments’ responsibility. If we want to keep our nature from degradation for our children and their future descendants, we have to act together to protect flora, fauna, our water and air resources from pollution.
21th
century, the century of high technology has provided us information and a clearer view about the nature and
environment
that
were corrupted
and polluted in the last two
centuries
.
Therefore
in our century it has become a worldwide burden to
improve
our
environment
.
Some
people
only
rely on the
government
or the
big
companies
to
improve
our
environment
.
But
I completely disagree with this
idea
. I believe that it’s a problem that bothers all humankind,
so
we
have to
deal with it
internationally
.
Governments
can provide protection for key ecosystems like rivers to protect the water purity, or another example as protecting or growing more mangroves which absorbs large quantity of carbon and
also
absorbs excess from flood.
Governments
and
big
companies
can promote and support green energy which provides our renewable energy. They can
also
accelerate improvement of
environment
by supporting
small
agricultural producers with the previous solutions altogether.
But
as we can fathom and comprehend, these solutions can be
very
challenging without cooperation of individuals. We can
reduce
and recycle our wastes which includes chemicals,
use
energy more
efficiently
such as using bikes or public transportation
instead
of cars or motorcycles, flying less. Planting trees and preventing forests from loss can do one of the greatest
help
to
improve
environment
, alongside with protecting its inhabitants within.
In conclusion
, I disagree that improvisation of
environment
is
only
governments
’ responsibility. If we want to
keep
our nature from degradation for our children and their future descendants, we
have to
act together to protect flora, fauna, our water and air resources from pollution.