It is undeniable that, everyone in the world appeal music while neglecting the age, sex, ethnicity and religion. Some brains think, everyone should allow to use these songs while others argue that, others should have original artist's permission to use it. In my opinion I strongly believe, people are allow to use others property with the authorization of owner which is even applicable for the music as well.
To begin with, If music shared with others, It will create several unnecessary problems. For Example, people may alter original words, meaning which will harm the artistic value of the original work. On the other hand, this may lead to cultural conflicts among cultures. A owner of a grate piece of art may never want to deteriorate it. Accordingly, first artist belong the masterpiece themselves and they have ability to allow others to use it with their supervision.
Similarly, they spend their time, knowledge, skills and money to produce their work. It is a hard work not only of a single person but also a group. Therefore, music concern as a private property. For For further clarification, scientists receive patient for their new discoveries. It can not be used without giving value to them. Music also a result of a hard work that need to be valued by others. It is illegal to use someone else someone else published work without proper referencing. As can be seen, It is not ethical to use artistic work without their authorization.
To conclude, there are enough evidence to support that the necessity of authorization from music artists to use their song. This will avoid possible unnecessary problems that can arise within the society due to the alteration of original version. the change of original work also unethical as they spent energy and resources to produce it. As can be seen, my view is, people should get permission from owner to share their music.
It is undeniable that, everyone in the world appeal
music
while neglecting the age, sex, ethnicity and religion.
Some
brains
think
, everyone should
allow
to
use
these songs while others argue that, others should have
original
artist's permission to
use
it. In my opinion I
strongly
believe,
people
are
allow
to
use
others property with the authorization of owner which is even applicable for the
music
as well
.
To
begin
with, If
music
shared with others, It will create several unnecessary problems.
For Example
,
people
may alter
original
words, meaning which will harm the artistic value of the
original
work
. On the
other
hand, this may lead to cultural conflicts among cultures.
A
owner of a grate piece of art may never want to deteriorate it.
Accordingly
,
first
artist belong the masterpiece
themselves and
they have ability to
allow
others to
use
it with their supervision.
Similarly
, they spend their time, knowledge,
skills
and money to produce their
work
. It is a
hard
work
not
only
of a single person
but
also
a group.
Therefore
,
music
concern as a private property.
For For
further
clarification, scientists receive patient for their new discoveries. It can not be
used
without giving value to them.
Music
also
a result of a
hard
work
that need to
be valued
by others. It is illegal to
use
someone else someone else
published
work
without proper referencing. As can be
seen
, It is not ethical to
use
artistic
work
without their authorization.
To conclude
, there are
enough
evidence to support that the necessity of authorization from
music
artists to
use
their song. This will avoid possible unnecessary problems that can arise within the society due to the alteration of
original
version.
the
change
of
original
work
also
unethical as they spent energy and resources to produce it. As can be
seen
, my view is,
people
should
get
permission from owner to share their
music
.